Cool! I'd be very interested in a copy of your C struct, if that's OK. Cheers, John :^P Tony Cappellini wrote: >> > On the other hand, a simple general hardware editor would do fine, I, >> > for example, don't > > Well, not sure about that. There was one for the Matrix 1000 years > ago, and it cost more than the synth. > A decent hardware based editor is likely to cost $600 or more, because > tooling costs will be high, and the number of units sold will probably > be very low. > > I have a C structure definition of the Xpander/M12 patch format somewhere. > I don't know how accurate it is, but it's probably close enough to > figure the rest out. -- John Pallister john@...
Message
Re: [xpantastic] Hardware Editor, or, why not a Solaris ...
2008-04-03 by John Pallister