At 17:08 Uhr +0100 03.06.2011, Brian wrote: > What you are saying is of course correct, unfortunately that is not the whole > story is it? I believe it pretty much is the whole story. > We don't have the PCB or the transformer here so we cannot assume that there > isn't a wire link added to match the cct diagram, or the possibility that the > manufacturer actually used a transformer where the centre tap is internally > connected. http://www.pmerecords.com/Keyboards/CrumarTrilogy/CrumarTrilogy11.jpg http://www.pmerecords.com/Keyboards/CrumarTrilogy/CrumarTrilogy14.jpg Those pictures show the general vicinity of the power supply, including the transformer and its connector. I see clearly two red and two yellow wires connecting the transformer to the power supply PCB which to me indicates two separate secondaries. > Having said all this if the two rails are in fact isolated from the this >could > answer why when checking continuity on the secondary a measured >value of > several megohms was found, if the test applied the prods to the outer two >ends > of the windings. The measurement would then be via the diodes of >the > rectifier. Indeed. It also should make troubleshooting rather simple: The original poster should simply unplug the transformer from the PCB and then power up. If it still blows the main fuse: transformer is definitely at fault. If not he should measure the AC voltage between red-red and yellow-yellow. > Whatever we are suggesting the PCB does not match the schematic so I would be > very wary of relying on either. I'd prefer to rely on fundamental >principles. Actually the PCB matches the schematic perfectly (well, nearly perfectly). I don't see a connection between the three terminals on the schematic, either. This is just the "dotted outline" going through the terminals, not a solid connection. Yes, it's not well drawn. Yes, I don't see the ground connection on the PCB as well but there are various ways to have this one implemented. As far as the fundamental principles go: Your scenario would short out one of the diodes of each rectifier, wouldn't it? So far all schematics I've seen (admittedly not too many) with separate bridge rectifiers use a dedicated secondary for each rectifier: Crumar Performer Polymoog Oberheim OB-X Kawai SX-210/SX-240 and probably many more.
Message
RE: [vintagesynthrepair] Re: Crumart Trilogy replacement power transformer
2011-06-03 by Malte Rogacki
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.