Sequential circuits samplers group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Sequential circuits samplers

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:40 UTC

Message

Re: [prophet2000] Prophet 2002+ firmware

2008-09-02 by John Pallister

.BIN implies a raw, unadorned stream of byte values; no 
headers, checksums or other formatting. The fact that it is 
32768 bytes long means it fits exactly into a 
15-bit-wide/256kbit EPROM chip (via an EPROM programmer).

For more information about EPROMs, see 
http://www.qsl.net/yo5ofh/doc/how_eprom_works.htm

Putting it in a .zip file means that you can test the 
integrity of the file (since the .zip format contains a 
checksum) to make sure there aren't any errors.

Note that I haven't tested this data (i.e. burned it back 
into a chip and tried it in my Prophet 2002+) so I can't 
make any promises that it'll work.

If anyone is brave enough to try this firmware in their 
2002, can they please let us know how it goes... ;)

Cheers,

John :^P

charles midi gfa pascal wrote:
> what exactually is this , i never used a .bin before , how do i utilize 
> such a file?
>  
> charles
> 
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* M. Toscarelli <mailto:toscarelli@...>
>     *To:* prophet2000@yahoogroups.com <mailto:prophet2000@yahoogroups.com>
>     *Sent:* Monday, September 01, 2008 3:42 PM
>     *Subject:* Re: [prophet2000] Prophet 2002+ firmware
> 
>     this is a great resource for hoarders like me to keep on the back
>     burner, thanks!!!!
>      
>     MIke
> 
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         *From:* John Pallister <mailto:john@...>
>         *To:* prophet2000@yahoogroups.com
>         <mailto:prophet2000@yahoogroups.com>
>         *Sent:* Monday, September 01, 2008 6:50 AM
>         *Subject:* [prophet2000] Prophet 2002+ firmware
> 
>         Hi,
> 
>         Well, it has only taken me a year or so, but I've finally
>         ripped my P2002+ firmware for you, all 32kB of it. The chip
>         in mine is an Atmel AT27256-25DC1. Unfortunately the sticker
>         had come off the little quartz window, so I can't say
>         exactly what version it is, but as I said, mine definitely
>         has the memory expansion and the multiple outputs, so it
>         should do the job for you.
> 
>         Cheers,
> 
>         John :^P
> 
>         djhohum wrote:
>          > --- In prophet2000@yahoogroups.com
>         <mailto:prophet2000%40yahoogroups.com>, John Pallister
>         <john@...> wrote:
>          >> I don't know offhand what OS my 2002+ has, but it does have
>          >> the individual outputs, so assuming it has the latest
>          >> version, I could pull the chips, read them and post the
>          >> binary file(s). But first I have to assemble my EPROM
>          >> programmer kit, and it'll be a week or two before I get
>          >> around to that (very busy with work blah blah).
>          >>
>          >> I've already promised to read the ROMs from my Wavestation
>          >> A/D and send them to someone called Tom, so you'll be number
>          >> two in the queue. ;)
>          >
>          > Great! I appreciate it. Let me know if I can return the favor.
>          >
>          >> What do people think of the ethics of "ripping" 20-year-old
>          >> synth firmware & posting/sending it (without charging
>          >> anything, of course)?
>          >
>          > I almost don't want to answer that because I'm pretty
>         opinionated on
>          > the matter.
>          >
>          >> In this case Wine Country might
>          >> actually have a license to the code, but I suspect that
>          >> other places I've seen don't (e.g. Route 66 Studios selling
>          >> the final JX-10 firmware).
>          >
>          > From a more practical perspective, however, he number of
>         people with
>          > eprom programmers is pretty small so I suspect that unless
>         you're
>          > selling the chips you aren't really cutting into wine country's
>          > business by sharing the images.
>          >
>          > tnx,
>          > daryl
-- 
John Pallister
john@...

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.