yes, fair point that Soundcloud's yukky 128kbps does the sound no favouts! The final timbre on the WAV just reminds me of a loudspeaker dying though lol I agree, it would be useful to have some sonic examples with the filter more closed, so we can hear more improvement in envelope snappiness without getting distracted by raspy sizzles. --- In PolySix@yahoogroups.com, Oakley Sound <oakleylist@...> wrote: > > > it sounds very noticeably more hissy to me the mod, and not so much > "snappy" as just raspy and nasal! > > One thing to point out here is that Soundcloud's compression algorithm > is particularly bad at highlighting things like increased brightness - > quite often turning them into something nasty. So it's worth downloading > the file to give it a proper listen to. > > > https://soundcloud.com/synthhacker/korg-polysix-sound-of-removing > > Having said that the third sample on that wav file sounds pretty awful > on one particular voice. Perhaps Chip could upload a more traditional > bass synth sound with a swept envelope. > > It's worth noting that all the mod does is remove the dynamic noise > reduction low pass filter that the whole instrument goes through. If you > want your sound to be a little darker as before then simply turn down > the cut-off frequency just a bit. What the mod does is give you that > choice - you can now have it brighter if you want where previously you > couldn't. The Polysix's SSM2044 voice filters are now the ones doing the > filtering and not having to work against the DNR filtering. > > The mod does not significantly affect loud patches with a long attack > since the DNR filter will be fully open 100mS after hitting the first > note. Although, by bypassing (or removing) the DNR filter you will have > less overall noise and distortion within the signal. > > But what the mod does do is sharpen the sound of fast transient sounds. > So plucky sounds will have a lot more life to them. > > I can't think of any other synth that has a DNR filter applied to its > main output when the ensemble/chorus unit is not engaged. The Polysix > already has noise reduction fitted to the ensemble circuitry so it does > seem somewhat overkill to install yet another filter on the direct output. > > One final point is that if one is fitting the mod like Chip has done > with the +15V being sent to the envelope follower's buffer then this > could be done with a switch fitted to the rear panel. Then one can > engage the DNR filter on the fly. > > Tony > > http://takla-makan.bandcamp.com/ > http://www.oakleysound.com >
Message
Re: Making the P6 brighter
2013-07-16 by feline1973
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.