Love it! Bravo! If you do decide to mess about the Polysix's tuning please keep us updated on your findings . . . with more graphs . . . and audio comparative samples! :D James On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:41 AM, chipaudette <chipaudette@yahoo.com> wrote: > ** > > > Hi All, > > I own both a Mono/Poly and Polysix. I had the Mono/Poly first and, given > that the two synths are of the same vintage and share much of their circuit > design, I got the Polysix assuming that it would be a poly synth that > sounded very similar, which is what I wanted. > > When i got the Polysix, I found certain small (but important!) differences > in sound. I've started to quantify the differences in the output of the two > synths. If you're interested in frequency analyses and whatnot, you might > choose to check out my figures and discussion... > > > http://synthhacker.blogspot.com/2013/02/high-frequencies-polysix-vs-monopoly.html > > I'm definitely interested in any comments that you might have. The boost > in treble frequencies relative to the ideal sawtooth is of particular > interest to me. Any theories? > > Thanks, > > Chip > > > -- C'est La Guerre Moving Pictures Inc. 364 Home Street Winnipeg, Manitoba R3G 1X4 (204) 918 9317 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [PolySix] Polysix vs Mono/Poly: Frequency Content
2013-02-17 by james meagher
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.