Hi Don, I've finally found the time and finished repairing. I needed to put abt 9 k on the trimpot placed on the R93 location for a good stability in tuning for the Polysix again. All in tune now between lower and upper C's. I used the VTL5C2 replacement. Thank you and all for contributing to this subject, this was a great help. Cheers! Simon --- In PolySix@yahoogroups.com, "backshall1 \(dsl\)" <backshall1@...> wrote: > > Hi Simon, > I haven't needed to replace another bad photocoupler so I haven't had a > chance to try a VTL5C3. I also haven't noticed any problems with tuning with > the VTL5C2 so I don't think there is a big enough difference to cause any > trouble. It is important to note the wide variation of values used for R93, > depending on which replacement you use for the P1501. It is always best to > put in a 50K trimpot, set the tuning controls to mid-point, and set the > trimpot for best initial tuning. > > As for "how" to do the replacement. I assume you are wondering how to put a > 4-wire radial-lead component into a 6-pin DIP slot. Well, I guess it is > really a 5-pin slot, since pin 5 doesn't exist. Going counter-clockwise, > pins 1,2,3 go down the left side, and pins 4 and 6 go up the right side. Pin > 5 is a blank space. Also, pin 3 is not connected to anything, so both old > and new components are really 4-pin devices. > > On the P1501, the KLM-366 schematic shows that pins 1,2 are the anode and > cathode of the LED, and pins 4,6 are the photo-resistor. You'll need the > pin-out diagram for whatever part you are using as a replacement to see > which two wires are the LED and which are the resistor, and what the > polarity of the LED is. Once you are certain which wire goes where, heat up > the soldering iron and get to work. > > Don B. > > _____ > > From: PolySix@yahoogroups.com [mailto:PolySix@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of > Andrew Jury > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 5:09 AM > To: PolySix@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [PolySix] Re: Replacement for HTV P1501 photocoupler? > > > > > Hi, > > I¹ve always used the Siliconix NSL32 and a 39K resistor at position R93 and > got very good results. Best of all they sell then off the shelf¹ at > Farnell, which considerably saves time in sourcing them. > > Cheers, > Andy > > On 10/05/2011 23:50, "ltern_te" <ninonine@... > <mailto:ninonine%40xs4all.nl> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Don/ Andy and thanks for your advice and feedback, > > > > Maybe a dummy question but how does one replace the P1501 with a VTL5CX ? > Btw. > > did anyone find out already if its better to use a VTL5C2 or VTL5C3 > > replacement? > > > > Thanks for the answer(s) in advance. > > > > Simon > > > > --- In PolySix@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> , Andrew > > Jury <andy@> wrote: > >> > > >> > Thanks Don, > >> > > >> > You advice and expertise are much appreciated! I shall have a bit more > of > >> an > >> > experiment, but I am at least ending up with the playable instrument > for my > >> > efforts rather than the sound of a piano that has been dropped out of a > >> > window! > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Andy > >> > > >> > > >> > On 27/07/2010 13:35, "longenough2002" <backshall1@> wrote: > >> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > I tested this by setting VR1,2,3 to their midpoint, inserted a > trimpot > >>> for R93 > >>> > > and adjusted the pot for best scaling. It seemed to be about 40 > point > >>> > > something K. 39K was the closest I had, so that's what I used. If > you > >>> have > >>> > > more resistor choices (41K, 42K?) you might want to try one of those > and > see > >>> > > if you get better results, or even leave in a 50K trimmer. > >>> > > Don B. > >>> > > > >>> > > --- In PolySix@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> > >>> <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> , Andrew > >>> > > Jury <andy@> wrote: > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > Hi, > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > Just wanted to say that I have been getting on very well with > the > >>>>> > >> > Silonex / 39k resistor mod. The only problem is the tuning is a > bit > >>>>> > >> > critical towards the lower end of the keyboard. Apart from that > all > is > >>>>> > >> > well and I am on my fourth successful repair. > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > Cheers, > >>>>> > >> > Andy > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > On 23 Jul 2010, at 16:31, "longenough2002" <backshall1@> > >>>>> > >> > wrote: > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > Shucks, just noticed a note in the "files" section > from > gil_we > >>>>>>> > >>> > > back in Oct 2007 where he replaced the p1501 with a > VTL5C3. I > wonder > >>>>>>> > >>> > > if the lower temperature coefficient of the VTL5C3 makes > it a > better > >>>>>>> > >>> > > choice than the VTL5C2 for the tuning circuit? Some day, I > gotta > >>>>>>> > >>> > > read the rest of the stuff in there. > >>>>>>> > >>> > > Don B. > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > --- In PolySix@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> > >>>>>>> <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> , > M Ll > >>>>> > >>> <f115@> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > Thanks for the update! > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > ________________________________ > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > From: longenough2002 <backshall1@> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > To: PolySix@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> > <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > Sent: Sat, June 12, 2010 8:53:50 AM > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > Subject: [PolySix] Re: Replacement for HTV P1501 > >>>>>>>>> photocoupler? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > Got another Polysix in the shop with tuning problems. > Same sort of > >>>>>>> > >>> > > thing with octaves "stretched" and it couldn't be > corrected > with the > >>>>>>> > >>> > > trim pots. The diode side of the photocoupler tested bad, > so > it was > >>>>>>> > >>> > > time to go shopping again. This time, I thought I would > try > one of > >>>>>>> > >>> > > the Vactrol parts, so I got a Vactec VTL5C2 from Small > Bear > (same > >>>>>>> > >>> > > place I got the Silonex part). I replaced R93 with 22K (up > from > >>>>>>> > >>> > > 4.7K) and it seems to be working very well, so now we have > a > couple > >>>>>>> > >>> > > of choices for replacing the P1501. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > Don B. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >>>>> > >> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: Replacement for HTV P1501 photocoupler?
2011-07-28 by ltern_te
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.