Hi, I¹ve always used the Siliconix NSL32 and a 39K resistor at position R93 and got very good results. Best of all they sell then off the shelf¹ at Farnell, which considerably saves time in sourcing them. Cheers, Andy On 10/05/2011 23:50, "ltern_te" <ninonine@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Don/ Andy and thanks for your advice and feedback, > > Maybe a dummy question but how does one replace the P1501 with a VTL5CX ? Btw. > did anyone find out already if its better to use a VTL5C2 or VTL5C3 > replacement? > > Thanks for the answer(s) in advance. > > Simon > > --- In PolySix@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> , Andrew > Jury <andy@...> wrote: >> > >> > Thanks Don, >> > >> > You advice and expertise are much appreciated! I shall have a bit more of >> an >> > experiment, but I am at least ending up with the playable instrument for my >> > efforts rather than the sound of a piano that has been dropped out of a >> > window! >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Andy >> > >> > >> > On 27/07/2010 13:35, "longenough2002" <backshall1@...> wrote: >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > I tested this by setting VR1,2,3 to their midpoint, inserted a trimpot >>> for R93 >>> > > and adjusted the pot for best scaling. It seemed to be about 40 point >>> > > something K. 39K was the closest I had, so that's what I used. If you >>> have >>> > > more resistor choices (41K, 42K?) you might want to try one of those and see >>> > > if you get better results, or even leave in a 50K trimmer. >>> > > Don B. >>> > > >>> > > --- In PolySix@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> >>> <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> , Andrew >>> > > Jury <andy@> wrote: >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Hi, >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Just wanted to say that I have been getting on very well with the >>>>> > >> > Silonex / 39k resistor mod. The only problem is the tuning is a bit >>>>> > >> > critical towards the lower end of the keyboard. Apart from that all is >>>>> > >> > well and I am on my fourth successful repair. >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Cheers, >>>>> > >> > Andy >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > On 23 Jul 2010, at 16:31, "longenough2002" <backshall1@> >>>>> > >> > wrote: >>>>> > >> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > Shucks, just noticed a note in the "files" section from gil_we >>>>>>> > >>> > > back in Oct 2007 where he replaced the p1501 with a VTL5C3. I wonder >>>>>>> > >>> > > if the lower temperature coefficient of the VTL5C3 makes it a better >>>>>>> > >>> > > choice than the VTL5C2 for the tuning circuit? Some day, I gotta >>>>>>> > >>> > > read the rest of the stuff in there. >>>>>>> > >>> > > Don B. >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > --- In PolySix@yahoogroups.com >>>>>>> <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> , M Ll >>>>> > >>> <f115@> wrote: >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > Thanks for the update! >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > ________________________________ >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > From: longenough2002 <backshall1@> >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > To: PolySix@yahoogroups.com >>>>>>>>> <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > Sent: Sat, June 12, 2010 8:53:50 AM >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > Subject: [PolySix] Re: Replacement for HTV P1501 >>>>>>>>> photocoupler? >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > Got another Polysix in the shop with tuning problems. Same sort of >>>>>>> > >>> > > thing with octaves "stretched" and it couldn't be corrected with the >>>>>>> > >>> > > trim pots. The diode side of the photocoupler tested bad, so it was >>>>>>> > >>> > > time to go shopping again. This time, I thought I would try one of >>>>>>> > >>> > > the Vactrol parts, so I got a Vactec VTL5C2 from Small Bear (same >>>>>>> > >>> > > place I got the Silonex part). I replaced R93 with 22K (up from >>>>>>> > >>> > > 4.7K) and it seems to be working very well, so now we have a couple >>>>>>> > >>> > > of choices for replacing the P1501. >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > Don B. >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > >>>> > > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>>>> > >>> > > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >>>>> > >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [PolySix] Re: Replacement for HTV P1501 photocoupler?
2011-05-11 by Andrew Jury
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.