There you go. Learned something new. Thanks, Andy. On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Andrew Jury <andy@networkjabber.com>wrote: > > > Ah yes! These are the ones used mostly for keeping transients away from the > DC outputs of the mux. Tolerance is not critical here so the types you > mention should suffice. BTW the 'K' ML talks about is the tolerance value, > which in this case is 10% and yes, 4 7 3 is 47 with 3 zeros pF, which is > 0.047uF as stated! > > Bye for now, > Andy > > > On 16/09/2010 19:29, "Jed Jorgensen" <jed.jorgensen@gmail.com<jed.jorgensen%40gmail.com>> > wrote: > > > For the plastic film caps, I would think you'll be fine > > with polyester,polystyrene, polypropylene, PTFE, metalized, etc. > > > > As for 473K ...I assume you mean 473 "XX" farads? What is the value you > are > > talking about. > > > > For the caps needed on the board: > > 0.047 microfarads = 47 nanofarads = 47,000 picofarads > > > > Take your pick. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Jed > > * > > * > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:04 AM, ML <f115@rocketmail.com<f115%40rocketmail.com>> > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Ah shoot. One of my local electronic shops was out of all but one of the > >> plastic capacitors needed for the KLM clone. They had 473K polyester > >> capacitors though. So, while not prefect, do you suppose this would be > an ok > >> substitute? Not ideal, I'm sure ... > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [PolySix] KLM Clone: plastic film vs. polyster caps
2010-09-16 by Jed Jorgensen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.