and thats wronger than what Rick does.
--- On Mon, 11/10/10, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Orchestrion becomes self-aware and replicates
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Received: Monday, 11 October, 2010, 5:22 AM
Why do you say that?
I think he's about as wrong as it's possible to get.
On 10/10/2010 02:44, fdoddy@aol.com wrote:
Woah! Yo dog! You
been hangin' wit Mike D ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Pring <markpringnz@yahoo.com>
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, Oct 9, 2010 8:14 pm
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Orchestrion
becomes self-aware and replicates
I think sloppy suits
music composed after Bach but not
before. Apart from Gould and
Tureck some of my favourite Bach
is direct midi output, more often
than not the performer and their
interpretation just get in the
way, music written after Bach is
so bereft of ideas that you need a
"performance" from the player just
to cover up the vacuum at the
heart of the music.
MarkMessage
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Orchestrion becomes self-aware and replicates
2010-10-10 by Mark Pring