Hmmm. Fair enough. I was surprised by it being referred to as 'junk' simply because the sound that comes out of it is not actually all that bad - certainly better than a lot of what the M-Tron has to offer. Mike lsf5275@aol.com wrote: > > In a message dated 12/8/2007 10:39:04 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, > mike.dickson@gmail.com writes: > > 'The Memotron is junk'? How so? > > I have been told this by musicians I respect who have played it, I > have been told it feels kind of cheesy and has one great flaw. It will > not retain samples. They must be reloaded every time it is turned on. > Also, sample access seems to be limited to those provided (at > substantial expense I've been told) by the manufacturer, or M-Tron > samples. That to me seem pretty solid evidence. > > Frank II > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out AOL Money Finance's list of the hottest products > <http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001> > and top money wasters > <http://money.aol.com/top5/general/ways-you-are-wasting-money?NCID=aoltop00030000000002> > of 2007. >
Message
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Mellotron/Clavia samples
2007-12-10 by Mike Dickson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.