Right and then maybe you could make another double manual version like the
Mark V .
Now that would be cool!
Tony (I haven't been there yet...)
----- Original Message -----From: NormLeete@aol.comSent: Sunday, June 21, 2009 6:46 AMSubject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Memotron and the predecessor!
In a message dated 20/06/2009 10:32:24 GMT Standard Time, kinchmusic@aol.com writes:Begs the question Martin. Why didn't you build it?Because tests showed that it did not sound quite like a Mellotron, or as the conversation went - "oh bugger it will have to have tapes in then..."Good thing really otherwise you wouldn't have had the M4000 we now have.Norm (I was there...)