The Mellotron Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

The Mellotron Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:38 UTC

Message

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: M4000D nice review with photos

2011-07-13 by fdoddy@aol.com

Mike, I am that someone and I never fuck with my samples.

fritz

 

 


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@gmail.com>
To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wed, Jul 13, 2011 3:58 pm
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: M4000D nice review with photos


  
    
                  
        On 13/07/2011 19:00, Tony wrote:    
                       
            
Another reason a                real Mellotron is better than the digital gadget, in my                opinion.
          
                  
    
    I have said this before and will say it again. It is not the    'digital' business that makes it good or bad - after all, that is    just a recording mechanism like tape - a means to an end.  However,    it's the tampering that people feel compelled to do with    the digital recordings that bothers me. Interpolating. Noise    reduction. Tuning. EQing. Normalising. 
    
    So far I have found no one anywhere who has just recorded    the instrument 'as is' and left it like that, warts and all.    'Honesty' aside, it would just sound better.
    
    Mike

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.