There were four - here's the listing with Harry's notations on variations. On 5/24/2011 8:43 PM, Bruce Daily wrote: > > Hi all- > I just have to keep everyone entertained! > We know the Mellotron M400 had standard tape sets (flute, violins, > 'cello). Did the Chamberlin have a standard set? If so, what were > the sounds? > -Bruce D. > > > --- On *Tue, 5/24/11, lsf5275@aol.com /<lsf5275@aol.com>/* wrote: > > > From: lsf5275@aol.com <lsf5275@aol.com> > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Chamberlin sounds > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com > Date: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 3:59 PM > > Impressive observation Bruce! > In a message dated 5/24/2011 12:00:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > pocotron@yahoo.com writes: > > It is also interesting that the last two Chamberlin M1's > on eBay had sequential serial numbers (86103 and 86104). > -Bruce D. > > > --- On *Tue, 5/24/11, Chris Dale > /<unobtainiumkeys@gmail.com>/* wrote: > > > From: Chris Dale <unobtainiumkeys@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Chamberlin sounds > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com > Date: Tuesday, May 24, 2011, 1:08 AM > > I did studio work for Sylvia Massy (the owner of this > Chamberlin) many years ago. > > I guess with most of them being located in the greater Los > Angeles area, she didn't feel the need to keep it if she > could rent one from somebody. > > I don't think the Rhythmate will sell for anywhere near > the $4500 listing price. There just isn't the demand for > them like there is for M1 models. > > I doubt this was the last M1 made (the pilot light is a > much older style and the switches are not chrome) but > should that actually be the case it's build year would be > early 1981, and there might be some alternate or > unreleased sounds in it. > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:30 AM, markpringnz > <markpringnz@gmail.com > <http://us.mc1259.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=markpringnz@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > I see it went for $9000, buy now price. > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com > <http://us.mc1259.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Charles" <charel196@...> wrote: > > > > another one on Ebay > > > > > http://cgi.ebay.com/RARE-Vintage-Chamberlin-M1-M-1-Optigan-Mellotron-/330567982620?pt=Keyboards_MIDI&hash=item4cf7631e1c > <http://cgi.ebay.com/RARE-Vintage-Chamberlin-M1-M-1-Optigan-Mellotron-/330567982620?pt=Keyboards_MIDI&hash=item4cf7631e1c> > > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com > <http://us.mc1259.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Thomas C. Doncourt" <tomdcour@> wrote: > > > > > > Mark, I can post note to note samples I made from > the same amplifier and > > > recording sytems if you like.. It might be better > if I actually played the > > > same musical passages on the two instuments but I > am away from them for > > > the next week > > > > > > > Any chance of posting a recording? > > > > > > > > Mark > > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com > <http://us.mc1259.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Thomas C. Doncourt" > > > > <tomdcour@> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> I can compare form an M1 and an M400 on the > cello and 3 violins. I can't > > > >> say which I like better though... the M1 is > brighter in both cases but > > > >> the > > > >> M400 seems fuller. Two slightly different > sounding instruments but each > > > >> with its purpose. The M1 sounds better to me > with the tone control > > > >> nearly > > > >> all the way up - the M400 I have the tone at > less than half. > > > >> > > > >> > I would be interested to hear I direct > comparison of the 3 violins > > > >> played > > > >> > on an M400 and a Chamberlin, has anybody on > the list got a working > > > >> > Chamberlin, did Mattias sort his out? > > > >> > > > > >> > Mark > > > >> > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com > <http://us.mc1259.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, > tronbros <tronbros@> wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Maybe different but not better. The M400 is > capable of hifi quality > > > >> if > > > >> >> given good source material. It is not the > muffled lofi beast > > > >> everyone > > > >> >> assumes. We have put excellent commercial > recordings through them > > > >> and > > > >> >> they handle up to 16k, clear and precisely. > Never underestimate the > > > >> >> potential of a mellotron. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Best, > > > >> >> > > > >> >> M > > > >> >> > > > >> >> mellotronics.co.uk <http://mellotronics.co.uk/> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> On 22 May 2011, at 00:32, "markpringnz" > <markpringnz@> wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Would these sound a lot different played > through a chamberlin? I > > > >> would > > > >> >> guess that they would. > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Chamberlin sounds
2011-05-25 by Vance Pomeroy
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.