The Mellotron Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

The Mellotron Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:38 UTC

Message

Re: [newmellotrongroup] Chamberlin M 1 on Ebay

2011-04-17 by lsf5275@aol.com

Ralph, Ralph, I'll take it!
 
 
In a message dated 4/17/2011 1:32:56 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
vance@juniperpacific.com writes:

 
 
 
I wouldn't say the case's construction was itself shoddy, but the choice of 
 the formica-type laminate presents a bad material differential that has my 
top  slightly bowed -- and the M's usually end up with chipped feet and 
other edges  that make them look crappy. Richard had told me that they had the 
case parts  made by a local furniture company that made the components in 
batches (Even  though mine is an M2, the lid has "M-1 E" marked on the inside 
because it was  the fifth in that batch). The main issue I could see for 
some is that because  the chassis is mostly screwed-together aluminum angle and 
it's fastened to the  bottom plywood deck, they can flex....but that's why 
you just set them on a  flat surface to play them. Other than that they're 
pretty sturdy. In  comparison to the M400 Mellotron's, I can guess that the 
furniture may not be  as good.

The statement that they both "more advanced" and "predecessor"  isn't very 
good history. Yes they were the predecessor - but the Mark II's are  much 
better engineered than Harry's Musicmasters. But later the Chamberlin M's  did 
use the better responding stereo heads - and the friction/tension rewind  
could be called more advanced by most.

But this is just the seller  working his audience, isn't it?

Vance

On 4/16/2011 10:05 PM, _lsf5275@aol.com_ (mailto:lsf5275@aol.com)  wrote:  
 
Clearly evident in those photos.  I would like to own one, though. I'm not 
likely to ever do so.
 
 
In a message dated 4/17/2011  12:23:57 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
_barrickjohn262@gmail.com_ (mailto:barrickjohn262@gmail.com)   writes:

 
The  shoddy case construction on the chamberlins is what always gets  me.

On  Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Rick Blechta <_rick@rickblechta.com_ 
(mailto:rick@rickblechta.com) > wrote:

 
 
 
 


On  Apr 16, 2011, at 9:08 PM, Mike Dickson wrote:


 
 
"The Chamberlin is the, better and more  advanced, predecessor to the 
Mellotron"

On what planet is  it 'more  advanced'?




 
 
 
 
The planet  Bieber.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.