Once again, Markus told me that the sounds were NOT taken directly from the master tapes. Otherwise, it would have been painfully obvious during an A/B comparison between an M4000D and a MkVI (or a 400), which I did at NAMM with the volume up and standing directly in front of the speaker on both occasions. I would dare any of you to tell the difference even under more controlled conditions. Frank 1 In a message dated 01/23/11 07:30:48 Pacific Standard Time, ecclesreinson@rogers.com writes: Let me try to explain this thread. Mr. Herder thinks that the samples in the M4000D were taken directly from the mastertapes, instead of a real Mellotron. I cannot imagine why they would do that. Did MR or DK say that they did this? Maybe they were misinterpreted. It makes no sense. P.S. Charles - The plexiglass mellotron has a more transparent sound. (some twit had to say it) Clay
Message
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-23 by mainpsych
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.