Nope
In a message dated 12/11/2010 12:22:31 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
pocotron@yahoo.com writes:
Well, okay, the spillbox needed to be mounted on the new brackets.
-Bruce D.
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, lsf5275@aol.com <lsf5275@aol.com> wrote:
From: lsf5275@aol.com <lsf5275@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: I goofed
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 11:51 AM
Another good guess. That wasn't a goof. I wasn't to that point yet. There
is an ovious assembly mistake in the first photo.
In a message dated 12/10/2010 1:26:53 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
pocotron@yahoo.com writes:
Okay, the retention ring and c-clip are missing from the end of the
capstan.
-Bruce D.
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, lsf5275@aol.com <lsf5275@aol.com> wrote:
From: lsf5275@aol.com <lsf5275@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: I goofed
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 11:16 AM
Nope, but you're getting close. The clips are not required for the machine
to operate correctly.
In a message dated 12/10/2010 1:13:59 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
pocotron@yahoo.com writes:
It would be much easier to put the headblock on if the W clips were
installed first.
-Bruce D.
--- On Fri, 12/10/10, Rick Blechta <rick@rickblechta.com> wrote:
From: Rick Blechta <rick@rickblechta.com>
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: I goofed
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 11:04 AM
On Dec 10, 2010, at 1:01 PM, _lsf5275@aol.com_ (http:/
/us.mc636.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=lsf5275@aol.com) wrote:
That's why I suspected you were merely being lazy. So find the error.
Hint: Something in the first picture is wrong. If you don't look at a 400 a
lot, you'll not likely see it. I'm sure Martin saw it right away. It was
not critical, but the machine could not work correctly as is was.
Well, it certainly wouldn't produce much of a signal without the
headblock!Message
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: I goofed
2010-12-11 by lsf5275@aol.com