What can be said, can be said clearly the rest... --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@...> wrote: > > Bernie - > > You seem to be totally misunderstanding what I am trying to say. Maybe I > am not expressing it properly. > > It is a limitation of Bruckner's Ninth Symphony, Mahler's Tenth Symphony > and Schubert's Seventh Symphony that they were all unfinished and had to > be completed by lesser talents. Do I still like them? Yes, all of them > and very much. Are they what I expect of those composers? No, not at all. > > You're right that Banks /et al /didn't use the Mellotron as a > 'substitute for orchestral instruments' because - to name one of the > limitations I described - the recordings themselves were not worth a > damn and don't sound like what they were supposed to represent. They > sound like a Mellotron. So if one choses to use them as such a > replacement for them (as was the original intention, more or less) then > it fails pretty miserably. That it still sounds great is really neither > here nor there. I am describing what /limits /the instrument as someone > may wish it be used. > > Yes, I know an accordion is limited if I chose to use it as a > cheeseboard, but I am talking about using it within the context that it > was designed to be uitilised. > > You're confusing your subjective personal taste for the more objective > matter of what the instrument can and cannot 'do'. That I think the > former is the more important criterion is not really important to the > discussion. > > Mike > > > > On 03/12/2010 15:59, tron400 wrote: > > > > > > > > Mike, it's not a matter of liking or disliking Mellotrons. I know that > > they were originally designed to imitate other instruments, but they > > don't seem to have been very successful there (except maybe in the > > hands of one member of this group :-). When I hear a TV commercial > > with Mellotron flute, I don't hear flutes, I hear a Mellotron. Same > > with the 3 violins. I don't hear violins, I hear another instrument > > altogether. The way Mellotrons have been used by prog rockers seems to > > have placed a stamp on Mellotrons as to how they are played by most > > people, making them unique instruments that don't sound like any other > > instrument. I don't think Tony Banks, Rick Wakeman or Fritz Doddy used > > Trons to substitute for orchestral instruments. I think they used them > > for the uniqueness of their sound and I think that uniqueness is what > > attracts people to Trons. So to me, because of the uniqueness of this > > instrument that does exactly what I want it to do and sounds exactly > > the way I want it to sound, it has no limitations for me. > > > > Frank, sometimes they taste like wood, sometimes they taste like > > metal, sometimes they taste like iron oxide and on extremely rare > > occasions, they taste like plexiglass. > > > > Bernie > > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com > > <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, Mike Dickson > > <mike.dickson@> wrote: > > > > > > What I listed are /ipso facto /the limitations of the Mellotron as an > > > instrument. I don't think anyone here will disagree with any of them. > > > > > > You liking them or not is a matter of taste. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > On 02/12/2010 12:04, tron400 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike, I think you and a few others misunderstand me. Frank Stickle's > > > > comment about not being able to drive them is closest to it if only > > > > for the absurdity. Pianos have limited range and only one voice. > > > > That's the way they're designed. I don't see that as a limitation. It > > > > is what it is. > > > > > > > > Bernie > > > > > > > > --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com > > <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com> > > > > <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, Mike Dickson > > > > <mike.dickson@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 01/12/2010 13:20, tron400 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > If Mellotrons have limitations, everything has limitations. No one > > > > > > ever mentions the limitations of a guitar or a piano, yet the > > article > > > > > > mentions Mellotron limitations without saying what they are. > > What are > > > > > > they? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Tuning > > > > > 2. Range > > > > > 3. Voices > > > > > 4. Recording quality > > > > > 5. Timbre > > > > > 6. White noise > > > > > 7. Tape audio artefacts > > > > > 8. Tape transport > > > > > 9. Playing position > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Give me a shout if you want more. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Mike Dickson, Edinburgh > > > > > > Free Music Project: http://www.mikedickson.org.uk/ > > > Or http://www.last.fm/music/Mike+Dickson > > > Or http://soundcloud.com/mikedickson > > > Or http://www.planetmellotron.com/revd4.htm#mikedickson > > > Or http://www.myspace.com/mellotronworks > > > > > > > > > -- > Mike Dickson, Edinburgh > > Free Music Project: http://www.mikedickson.org.uk/ > Or http://www.last.fm/music/Mike+Dickson > Or http://soundcloud.com/mikedickson > Or http://www.planetmellotron.com/revd4.htm#mikedickson > Or http://www.myspace.com/mellotronworks >
Message
Re: Speaking of the M4000, what's with this?
2010-12-03 by markpringnz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.