Maybe not as good as ADI's DSPs, but probably
better than some low-end DSPs (for example Microchip's
rfPIC). There are some drawbacks, of course (no
hardware loops, lack of division, no special
addressing modes), yet I believe it should perform
quite well for medium complexity DSP algorithms.
-
--- Leon Heller <leon_heller@...> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "karldalen" <karldalen@...>
> To: <lpc2100@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 1:52 PM
> Subject: [lpc2100] DSP'ing with the LPC21xx
>
>
> > Hi!
> > I recently studied the LPC MAC instruction set and
> suspect
> > that the 21xx would be very good at running many
> DSP routines.
> >
> > Infact so efficent that it would make many low
> cost DSP's
> > quite obsolete! Knowing that most DSP dev tools
> are costly!
> >
> > Have anyone any experience into this?
> > What do you think about the LPC's DSP kapability?
>
> I'm interested in trying this myself. The
> performance should be reasonable,
> approaching 60 MMACs. You'll have to use assembler
> as the C compilers don't
> support the MAC operation AFAIK.
>
> It won't be anything like as good as the ADI
> Blackfin of course. I've got
> the Blackfin EZKit - it offers up to 1.2 GMACs from
> its two ALUs operating
> in parallel at 600 MHz!
>
> Leon
> --
> Leon Heller, G1HSM
> Email: aqzf13@...
> My low-cost Philips LPC210x ARM development system:
> http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/lpc2104.html
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lpc2100/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> lpc2100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonusMessage
Re: [lpc2100] DSP'ing with the LPC21xx
2004-01-14 by Bogdan Marinescu
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.