Yahoo Groups archive

Lpc2000

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:31 UTC

Message

Re: [lpc2100] Re: Introduction to the group

2003-12-04 by Hugh O'Keeffe

Hi Shinji,
Thanks for your feeback. I recommend the following:
1. Continue to use the GNU tools provided by Ashling. These are not time limited in any way when you use them from a Cygwin Bash Shell. We provide full binaries and source for the GNU tools on our CD.
2. Look at using a lower cost debug option such as McGreigor Raven and the GNU GDB/Insight debuggers. I'm sure there are others on this forum who can get you started quickly.
Hugh @ www.ashling.com/support/lpc2100
----- Original Message -----
From: ShinJi
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:16 AM
Subject: [lpc2100] Re: Introduction to the group

I hope that my introduction post did not demean Ashling in any way.
That was not my intention. I tried to word it carefully to point out
that Ashling dev kit wasn't working out for "our project". We ran
into alot of problems with it. These problems go beyond what I would
call normal 'new to platform, RTFM issues'. The eval timed out so
often it actually affected what little time we have to develop with
it. Instead of spending time learning, we spent hours reinstalling
from scratch. Your offer for assistance is appreciated but, The last
eval kit we bought is about to time out on us now.

Neither myself, nor my development partner do embedded work for a
living. Unless I can figure out a way to convience my wife that the $
1500.00 I would spend on the full dev kit is justified, we are done
messing with our eval kits. I am sure my attitude would be different
if I did this kind of development professionally or the overall
experience was better than it was.

I would recommend to anyone interested in professional Arm7
development to consider Ashling. Their eval kit has everything you
need to get started and enough time to decide if the LPC2106 is right
for your application. The Ashling Full dev kit is attractively priced
for anyone intending to make a profit producing products with the
Arm7.

This brings me to the question for the group that I had about
building our own GNU C toolset. I know I will miss the nice features
we have enjoyed using both ASIDE (windows IDE) and Pathfinder (visual
debugger). Still, I can give those features up if it means we can
continue working on the project. Something is alot better than
nothing at all.

Robert, I appreciate your offer to help me get started building a
GCC-Arm7 toolset. With your permission, I can contact you by email.
We have a prototype board layout finished, now I just need to be able
to flash and debug to continue the project. Loading the code into RAM
is nice because it is alot faster than flashing. Also, It doesn't
restrict the number of breakpoints we can set for debugging. (one)

If you can point me in the right direction towards getting the GCC-
arm tools working, I would be greatful.

shinji242 at yahoo dot com


--- In lpc2100@yahoogroups.com, "Hugh O'Keeffe"
wrote:
> Hi Shinji,
>
> Disappointed to hear of your problems with Ashling tools and that
you
> are not happy with the support from Ashling. As manager of the
> development tools group in Ashling I want to address this
immediately.
> Please let me know what your problems are and I will do my utmost to
> help.
>
> Hugh @ http://www.ashling.com/support/lpc2100/




To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lpc2100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.