--- In logic-ot@yahoogroups.com, Dennis Gunn <dennis@s...> wrote:
>
> I am all for tolerance but I am totally against faky social
> relativism. The "Oh we don't expect you to be able to get it
right"
> attitude behind it is far more condescending that the empiricalism
> that it is intended to remedy.
Depends ... sometimes "taught" grammar has functional bugs and
shortcomings in the specifications, and it often makes more sense to
use common "sloppy" workarounds that are less likely to cause
confusion or offence.
The classic one is the common use of "they" to refer to one person of
unspecified gender. My lot were taught at school that if you don't
know someone's gender you _must_ always refer to them as "him", as in
"Please send in the next job applicant and ask if he wants a coffee".
Everyone I know ignored that rule and used the plural instead, and
now finally the OED has caved in and accepted that that's now the
official preferred usage. It's a fairly recent change of policy, so
you can catch a lot of older people out with it.
I also hate the way that when you follow a quote with a comma, you
are /supposed/ to put the comma inside the quotation marks. That's
logically wrong, and I refuse to do that. It's bad code!
And I think that the use of certain "taught" rules is just stupid.
The only thing that I can think of right now that bugs me about US
grammar is when you get some Dumb American Grammar Nazi who insists
on saying "an Hotel" with a strongly pronounced H, and corrects
others who don't. It only seems to be well-educated Americans who do
that.
"An hotel" is only correct if you are treating "hotel" as a french
word and not pronouncing the "h" ("Go to an 'otel").
If you pronounce the "h", you are using it as an English word,
the "n" is no longer neccessary to separate the two vowel sounds "a"
and "o", and "Go to a hotel" is then the correct English-language
construction.
So when I hear someone showing off and loudly proclaiming "An
_H_otel!", I tend to think that they probably received more education
than their brain was properly equipped to process.
[Erk]
Teacher: "In English, a double negative gives a positive,
but there's no possible way for a double positive to give
a negative!"
Sarcastic student: "Yeah, right ..."Message
[L-OT] Re: Grammar...
2003-09-06 by Eric Baird
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.