>And rightfully so. Solving a theorem that has puzzled many great >mathematicians for some 350 years _is_ a work of art, I guess. Its not just that. Its hard to explain. There is a beauty in the clever and novel ideas, just as there is in the clever use of melody and unexpected use of the orchestra or sampler. I don't claim to understand Wiles work, but almost all of math has some sort of inherent beauty to those who understand it. I personally like Galois's ideas - how he abstracted the search for solutions of a polynomial equation, to symetries of roots, which lead to group theory, and from that lead to proofs of the impossibility of solving the quintic, trisecting an angle, and doubling a cube. Applied math and science people look at things quite differently than those in pure math. Pure math degrees are usually ".. of arts", whereas all the applied math degrees are "... of science."
Message
Re: Re: Re: [L-OT] music and maths
2001-11-11 by GAmoore@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.