>> As Logic baby implied above, I'd say that the biggest difference between >> analogue and analogue modelling in digital synths is largely due to the 'non >> linearities' that creep into the system in the various stages of a real >> analogue >> synth. No, the biggest difference is that digital is a sampled-time system, which means that it's subject to time aliasing (usually just called aliasing). It's truly a challenge to make something sound close to it's analog counterpart while sampling at just above the hearing threshold (<24KHz bandwidth in a 48KHz system). I was just reading an AES paper on how a decent peak limiter would need a 6MHz sample rate to keep aliasing noise to inaudible levels.... these days I guess that's a practicality, what with 2GHz Pentiums.... Compared to this problem, even controlling quantization noise seems simple (well, maybe not THAT simple...) ...and this is just getting a reasonably 'transparent' translation beteween digital and analog worlds, so that you might be able to appreciate subtleties like modelling analog component drift & mismatch, etc...
Message
Re: [L-OT] Re: Analog synth is still better
2001-11-06 by marc lindahl
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.