--- In logic-ot@y..., GAmoore@a... wrote: > Ironically one of the main rallying cries of the extremists is that US > troops are in Saudi. Never mind that the 'infidels' are protecting the > holy sites from another Arab country. However, Bin Laden's wish to > liberate the holy lands is exactly and precisely the mission of the > crusaders. They wanted to liberate their holy lands. The only problem was > that we had some of the same holy lands, and yet both peoples were too > stupid to realize the reason for this is because we actually worship the > same god (if we worship at all). > Bin Laden's wish is to have Taliban-style governments installed in the two most important countries in the Muslim world: Saudi Arabia (the one with the money), and Pakistan (the one with the bomb).His motives are far from being holy in nature. What I was pointing out was the common arguement that Some Muslims use to justify their hatred of us. If it was the Us governments role to protect the Saudis from the bin Laden of the world, then it was the job of the Saudis to make that clear to the rest of the Muslim world. and BTW, we've been training other countries armies for decades, so why can't we train the Saudis to defend themselves? That seems more feasible than having US troops where they are clearly not wanted, and it makes the US look less like the errand boys of the world. just my 2 cents. Sorry if I've digressed too far. :-) Charles
Message
Re: Liberating Holy Lands
2001-10-12 by cas@s.netic.de
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.