Thoughts from the mind of GAmoore@..., 9/24/01:
>Lets just drop the argument.
Fine.
>I respect Hendrik as someone with
>intelligence and conscience, even I don't agree.
Now _that's_ making sense.
>Maybe you will turn out to be right, and the US will overreact, but
>lets just wait to see before assuming it to be true.
I didn't say the US will overreact. I only warned for possible
overreactions, esp. after hearing Bush talk. But even sounding a
word of warning apparently is enough nowadays to "set the house on
fire".
>Europe could help, according Bush's speech this morning, by making it
>easier to seize terroist's money.
If the terrorists have money in Europe, then they'll surely have it
in Swiss bank-accounts, and not in e.g. Holland or Germany.
Switzerland is not part of the EU (as far as I know), and they keep
very much to themselves. I don't think they will change their laws
(something quite fundamental) to accomodate Bush's request, and the
EU will not have sufficient influence to convince them otherwise, I
suspect.
Apart from that... I can see the logic behind Bush's idea, but
wonder how realistic it is. First of all, he implicitly requests a
_lot_ of countries to change their laws. I don't know how viable or
reasonable that is in itself. And: such a change of laws would mean
that governments have easy access to privacy-sensitive information --
a very hot item this last decennium, with technology progressing,
large databases being set up, and the general feeling among the
public that "big brother slowly starts watching you".
So I would really be amazed if the money-seizing-tactic would
actually have a deep effect. But who knows...?
cheers,
HJ
--
Hendrik Jan Veenstra
email: mailto:h@...
www: http://www.ision.nl/users/h/index.htmlMessage
Re: Re: [L-OT] Hendrik's Logic
2001-09-25 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.