Yahoo Groups archive
Thread
2009-02-11 by tyrone_topheavy
Instead of mounting Pots on the face of the Poly 800, couldn't I mount 2 1/4" jacks on the back, route the wiring that would normally go to those, and use a CC pedal (or two) ? Of course, this would inhibit use of these controls while the unit is "strapped on", but I don't think many people use it keytar style anyway, right ? Or am I missing something obvious ?
2009-02-11 by Alec Jahn
Instead of mounting Pots on the face of the Poly 800, couldn't I mount
2 1/4" jacks on the back, route the wiring that would normally go to
those, and use a CC pedal (or two) ?
Of course, this would inhibit use of these controls while the unit
is "strapped on", but I don't think many people use it keytar style
anyway, right ?
Or am I missing something obvious ?
2009-02-11 by Tyrone Lumley
Yeah, I was just thinking that too.... --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Alec Jahn <ocedtotehmax@...> wrote:
From: Alec Jahn <ocedtotehmax@...> Subject: Re: [korgpolyex] Moog Slayer, with a twist ? To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 10:04 PM My only concern would be the impedance rating of the pots vs the pedal. I'd assume it'd work, though...? On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:53 PM, tyrone_topheavy <tyrone_topheavy@ yahoo.com> wrote: Instead of mounting Pots on the face of the Poly 800, couldn't I mount 2 1/4" jacks on the back, route the wiring that would normally go to those, and use a CC pedal (or two) ? Of course, this would inhibit use of these controls while the unit is "strapped on", but I don't think many people use it keytar style anyway, right ? Or am I missing something obvious ?