Yes, I ordered and received 200 pieces of the digital pot chip. So I have enough for 200 more before I would need to redesign the AtomaHawk. Mike ________________________________ From: Baptiste <vrai_son@...> To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com Sent: Mon, April 25, 2011 3:08:59 PM Subject: [korgpolyex] Re: The HAWK kit - update Hi Mike, Thanks for the message. First time I hear about the arpegiator software and I'm very interested about it!!! One thing I wanted to know, did you get the chip for the AtomaHawk? Best regards, Bapt. --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "korgpolyex800" <korgpolyex800@...> wrote: > > Hi Hawk owners, > > For those of you who have been HAWK fans, I thank you! > > The arpeggiator software update will be released very soon. I know some of you > are very interested in that feature. > > For customers that bought the kit within the last six months, I discovered that > I was supplied with a batch of bad 256K flash memory chips. > > If you experience problems with your kits I am going to provide a repair > service. I will help you to determine if your kit has a bad flash chip. > > Then, you pick up the cost of shipping the HAWK board back to me and I will do > the repair for you and pick up the cost of shipping it back to you. > > I apologize for the difficulty some of you have recently experienced. I hope >you > can understand that when I or anyone else order chips, we all have an > expectation that the chips are OK. In this particular shipment of chips, I > discovered that 4 out 5 of them were bad. > > A little update on the hardware side of things. I have redesigned the HAWK > board. It is now much smaller and uses fewer chips. This makes it much better > for MK2 owners and much easier to mount in the Poly-800 and the EX-800. > > Thanks for taking a moment to read my update. > > Rock on - Korgers! > > Mike >
Message
Re: [korgpolyex] Re: The HAWK kit - update
2011-04-25 by Michael Hawkins
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.