On 30 Apr 2009, at 15:10, patrioticduo wrote:
(for example), on the same step (just to be clear)?
slide in Portamento Mono mode, so it's nice and intuitive.
Would we need a global portamento rate parameter for the sequencer,
assuming that portamento wasn't an accent-type. and was activated for
a particular step by holding two notes, as outlined above?
a|x
> Hi Alex,No problem.
>
> No, the upgrade memory and the boards still have not shown up.
> Sorry about that. I'll let you all know when they do come in.
> No, you won't be able to accent on ANY parameter. There will be aFair enough.
> short list of parameters that can be accented. I have VCF cutoff,
> resonance, EG decay and perhaps portamento as possible accents. I
> am willing to take suggestions on the list but I can't foresee
> doing more than four due to the amount of memory that it's going to
> take and the extra burden on the CPU.
> Yes, you will be able to accent on all of those specific parametersGotcha. So, you'll be able to accent the env decay and filter cutoff
> that are actually implemented in the accent feature. But as I said,
> the list of accents will be limited to a very short list. An entire
> block of memory will be allocated for each and every available accent.
(for example), on the same step (just to be clear)?
> 32 steps per arrangement x 8 arrangements = 256 bytes. So eachI see.
> accent will take 256 bytes of flash memory. So four accents would
> use 1K of flash. The note sequences themselves will take 256 bytes
> (but we'll just hijack the memory that was allocated to the
> sequencer for that).
> How we enter notes to do portamento is something I'll have to thinkShould work, I think. It's also the same method used for activating
> about. I think your suggestion of holding a note and pressing a new
> one should be a workable solution.
slide in Portamento Mono mode, so it's nice and intuitive.
Would we need a global portamento rate parameter for the sequencer,
assuming that portamento wasn't an accent-type. and was activated for
a particular step by holding two notes, as outlined above?
a|x
>
> Mike.
>
>
>
> --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Alex Drinkwater <the_voder@...>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30 Apr 2009, at 14:11, korgpolyex800 wrote:
>>
>>> 1) A global parameter - Arranger Mode - would allow choosing "arp",
>>> "arp hold" or "arranger learn" and "arranger play" modes. Arranger
>>> learn mode allows selecting which arrangement you wish to play and
>>> edit using the numeric keypad. So there would be 8 arrangements
>>> available. Each one would contain 32 notes.
>>> 2) Another global parameter - Arrangement Play Order - allows
>>> choosing the type of arranger pattern play mode. 0=play arrangement
>>> 1 only, 2=play arrangements 1213121..., 3=play 123456781234... and
>>> other arrangements would be available in the list.
>>> 3) Another global parameter allows setting the number of MIDI clock
>>> (or on board seq. clock) ticks per beat (anywhere from 1 to 32
>>> ticks per beat).
>>> 4) To get into arranger mode, hold down the Poly button and press
>>> Start. The arranger immediately starts playing. If you've have not
>>> recorded anything into the arranger then it will be silent.
>>> 5) Display would show "Ax yy zz" where A means ARP or Arrange, x is
>>> the current accent type, yy is the current selected pattern and zz
>>> is the current position in that pattern.
>>> 4) You enter notes at any time in the arrangement by hitting them
>>> in time with the arranger. The arranger would be monophonic and
>>> inserts hit keys into the arrangement in time with the sequence.
>>> This allows you to write in notes at any point in the arrangement.
>>> Pressing the write key deletes the next note that would be played
>>> in the arrangement. So holding down the write key through the
>>> entire arrangement (32 notes) would clear all the notes.
>>> 5) The current accent (x) is the type of accent data you want to
>>> enter in real time. Pressing the Up/Down buttons would cycle
>>> through the possible values. 0=VCF cutoff, 1=resonance, 2=decay
>>> time (others?). You use the joystick to select the desired amount
>>> of accent and at the moment in the arrangement that you want the
>>> accent applied (inserted) you press the step key. The next note
>>> will have that accent applied. The accent value is calculated by
>>> taking the patches actual set value and adding or subtracting from
>>> it according to the Y axis deflection of the joystick.
>>> 6) When in "arranger learn" mode, you can select any one of the
>>> eight possible arrangements by pressing 1-8 on the keypad. The
>>> display (yy) will change from 01 thru 08 according to which
>>> arrangement is playing. In this manner, you can edit all 8
>>> different arrangements one at a time because in learn mode, the one
>>> arrangement repeats endlessly. So you would edit one, select
>>> another one using the keypad, edit that one, select the next one
>>> and so on.
>>> 7) When in "arranger play" mode, the arrangements are played in
>>> sequence according to the global parameter "Arranger Play Order".
>>> We will have to come up with a list of the types of ordering that
>>> we want.
>>> 8) There would be no way to adjust the duration of the notes other
>>> than a global parameter that sets the note hold time after the note
>>> onset measured in ticks (1-64). So a note hold of 1 means turn the
>>> note off one tick after the note comes on whereas a note hold of 12
>>> would keep the note held for 12 ticks.
>>> 9) The beat position in the arrangement is displayed in the last
>>> two digits of the display (yy) and constantly changes as the
>>> arranger plays through the notes. So it the display would show
>>> 01,02,03...32,01,02,03...32...
>>>
>>> That doesn't sound too complicated now does it?
>>
>> I like it- this all sounds great!
>>
>> It does sound complex, but given the limited controls available,
>> that's unavoidable. It looks like you've really thought this through
>> though.
>>
>> A few things occur to me:
>>
>> - You mention use of the joystick in a couple of places. What's the
>> alternative for EX-800 users? Could you also set accent level using
>> the keyboard maybe, or pitch-bend/modulation?
>> - How about slide notes? Would slide be activated by continuing to
>> hold down the previous note while pressing the new one?
>> - Would it be possible to combine accent types on the same note? You
>> seem to suggest in 5. above, that this wouldn't be the case. Might be
>> nice either to be able to do this, or to have another type of accent
>> that maybe combined say, decreasing the filter envelope decay, and
>> increasing the cutoff and resonance at higher settings.
>> - There are circumstances where modulating the envelopes' decay times
>> wouldn't have an appreciable effect, because of other envelope
>> settings. Would you somehow change the envelope to a simple AD
>> (Attack Decay) one if an accent type was selected that would modulate
>> the decay time?
>>
>> I know I've mentioned this before, and I'm still not clear on whether
>> it would actually be possible, but once we get into setting
>> particular parameters per-step from a sequencer, it would be great to
>> be able to set any arbitrary parameter and record that into the
>> sequencers memory for that step. I realise there's a whole new level
>> of complexity (and memory-usage) there though.
>>
>> Incidentally, are the upgrade chips available yet? If so, can I place
>> an order for one?
>>
>> a|x
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Mike.
>>>
>>>
>>> --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Alex Drinkwater <the_voder@>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That's the ticket!!!
>>>>
>>>> Nice one. Then that's a definite 'YES', in that case.
>>>> Would the sequence be transposable from the keyboard? How do you
>>>> envisage the notes, accents and slides being inputted (if that's
>>>> the
>>>> correct word)?
>>>>
>>>> a|x
>>>>
>>>> On 30 Apr 2009, at 00:49, Michael Hawkins wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, that is the plan.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was thinking that we would do VCF cutoff, resonance and decay
>>>>> time
>>>>> accenting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Alex Drinkwater <the_voder@>
>>>>> To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 3:07:49 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [korgpolyex] Re: Arpeggiator for HAWK-800
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you could add accents and slides;
>>>>> absolutely!!
>>>>>
>>>>> a|x
>>>>>
>>>>> --- On Wed, 29/4/09, patrioticduo <patrioticduo@ yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> From: patrioticduo <patrioticduo@ yahoo.com>
>>>>>> Subject: [korgpolyex] Re: Arpeggiator for HAWK-800
>>>>>> To: korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com
>>>>>> Date: Wednesday, 29 April, 2009, 7:33 PM
>>>>>> Well Poly is happy to work with
>>>>>> changing MIDI clock rates same as any synth is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Next question for everyone is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While I'm doing the ARP it occurred to me that I could make
>>>>>> a 16 note arranger/sequencer similar to TB-303. I never used
>>>>>> a 303 so I don't know how it works but...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would anyone consider a real time sequencer on the Poly to
>>>>>> be a useful thing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- In korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com,
>>>>>> "narfman96" <narfman96@ ..> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes that is what I meant for a work around if freqspec
>>>>>> really wanted to try it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --- In korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com,
>>>>>> "patrioticduo" <patrioticduo@ > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey Fran,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Would it overload the HAWK midi clock if you
>>>>>> applied a
>>>>>>>> LFO clocked routine externally from a DAW?"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You mean your DAW would send variable rate MIDI
>>>>>> clocks? If yes, then Poly would be OK with that. If not,
>>>>>> then I guess I don't understand what you're suggesting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --- In korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com,
>>>>>> "narfman96" <narfman96@> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When my brother showed me all the already
>>>>>> compiled utilities in Java I had to laugh. Visual Basic same
>>>>>> thing. He's not learning programming on the scale that the
>>>>>> old timers knew. Just go grab an easy to find utility on the
>>>>>> web and away you go....
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mike, you explained to me why I write and
>>>>>> freely share all my patches. At the end of the day I know
>>>>>> how all my synths work inside and out. If I need a sound I
>>>>>> can usually visualize what needs to be done to get it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your Arp ideas are great! Would it overload
>>>>>> the HAWK midi clock if you applied a LFO clocked routine
>>>>>> externally from a DAW? Oh well, bennies and the jet. Sorry
>>>>>> about our indigenously high pollen count this time of
>>>>>> year. Fran
>>>>>>>>> --- In korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com,
>>>>>> LARRY HAWKE <gorgarh@> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday I couldn't spell
>>>>>> programmer.. .now I ARE one! ;^)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think the coolest thing about my
>>>>>> keyboard obsession is to park the Poly 800 next to my 'wall
>>>>>> of keyboards' (Korg R3/microK/Alesis) and still play the
>>>>>> heck out of it even though it's severly limited compared to
>>>>>> my 21st Century gear.
>>>>>>>>>> Considering that I paid $75 bucks for
>>>>>> the Poly 800 (compared to a total of $2,000 for the others),
>>>>>> I find that to be pretty mind-blowing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jam on! (learn with Gern!)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Gor
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To: korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com
>>>>>>>>>> From: korgpolyex800@
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:23:59 +0000
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [korgpolyex] Re: Arpeggiator
>>>>>> for HAWK-800
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LOL,
>>>>>> that's pretty funny that you should ask for something that
>>>>>> is not only difficult - but in actuality, damn near
>>>>>> impossible. ROFL.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But since you asked in jest and since I
>>>>>> am as high as a kite on Benadryl to stop my ugly allergies
>>>>>> and also since I have been listening to Solarfields Brainbow
>>>>>> and other incredibly uplifting trance tracks. And what's
>>>>>> more, since I have cleaned my office top to bottom and the
>>>>>> weather is fantastic - well, here is a little off topic rant
>>>>>> that I hope you all enjoy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> First of all, the Arpeggiator is going
>>>>>> to be clocked by MIDI or the built in sequencer so you can
>>>>>> always vary the ARP rate by changing either of those clocks.
>>>>>> But I am assuming that you wanted to vary the rate in the
>>>>>> sense that you want to modulate the clock rate. Say, by
>>>>>> sending an LFO into the clock rate in order to modulate it.
>>>>>> Now that is the kind of question that makes my head go off
>>>>>> in all directions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But thankfully, before that happened, I
>>>>>> received a great article - at just the right moment - about
>>>>>> the history of software programming and all of the problems
>>>>>> that go with it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.computer world.com/ action/article. do?command=
>>>>> viewArticleBasic &taxonomyName= Development& articleId=
>>>>> 9132061&taxonomy Id=11&pageNumber =1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And boy did I get a laugh reading
>>>>>> through that article, because just about everything it
>>>>>> mentions has been a big factor in the last two years of
>>>>>> programming the HAWK-800. You have to keep in mind that the
>>>>>> Poly 800 is based on the 80C85 microprocessor and I didn't
>>>>>> want to buy a C compiler, and also there was a free 8085
>>>>>> assembler out there called TASM - well, I ended up doing
>>>>>> this entire project using assembler. Which seemed like it
>>>>>> would be fun (and difficult) at the time I chose that
>>>>>> direction but since I had also found a free disassembler
>>>>>> that I was able to put the original ROM code through - well,
>>>>>> here we are - two years later and a lot of spaghetti code
>>>>>> has been produced which actually does the job rather nicely
>>>>>> but - well, to be honest, maintaining the new code has been
>>>>>> a lesson in programming that I never thought I would
>>>>>> experience. Certainly not in the year 2009! The last time I
>>>>>> wrote any assembler at all was around 1994 and even then I
>>>>>> wrote awful code!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So then what's this all about you say.
>>>>>> Well, in my own silly way I just had to have a laugh
>>>>>> thinking about how mad crazy this project really is and has
>>>>>> been the whole time. But dang! if I didn't have the most
>>>>>> awesome time doing all of this and I frankly don't mind if
>>>>>> the only thing I am remembered for in the wider world after
>>>>>> I'm gone is that I was mad enough, crazy enough and or
>>>>>> stupid enough to have created a kit that so far only about
>>>>>> 30 people have gained benefit from. And that, even then, the
>>>>>> HAWK-800 kit is just an enhancement to a synthesizer that is
>>>>>> widely considered to be one of the cheapest (because it was)
>>>>>> pieces of crap masquerading as a real synthesizer.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The irony, oh the irony of it all is
>>>>>> that probably even this kit won't be remembered at all and
>>>>>> the only benefit from most of this work is that I can
>>>>>> honestly say that I learned more about programming and more
>>>>>> about the wizardry of sound synthesis and then made not a
>>>>>> single a buck out of it but did just have a wonderful time
>>>>>> doing it. And so it really isn't about the destination, it's
>>>>>> the journey that matters after all.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, for those of you who managed to
>>>>>> read this far and were hoping for a wider or more poignant
>>>>>> point - I hate to say it - but there isn't one. Consider
>>>>>> yourself to be Rick Rolled! LOL
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now back to this ARP thing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers all!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --- In korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com,
>>>>>> Frequency Spectrum <freqspec@> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> any chance of having a swing rate
>>>>>> included.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If so i would buy the mod for my
>>>>>> mk2
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Im only joking this would be very
>>>>>> difficult i suspect.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:00 PM,
>>>>>> patrioticduo <patrioticduo@ >wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Poly fans,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am in the process of
>>>>>> writing the code for an arpeggiator for the Poly.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a couple of questions
>>>>>> since I've not used an arp for some time and
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> also, I want to make the ARP
>>>>>> unique in its functions compared to other
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ARP's.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What does everybody think
>>>>>> about the following ARP features?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In ARP mode, the display will
>>>>>> show "A" (replacing the "P") and only Poly
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> mode is supported when in ARP
>>>>>> mode. You select ARP mode by holding down the
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Poly" button and then
>>>>>> pressing the Seq. Start button. This makes it very
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> easy to get into ARP mode for
>>>>>> performances. To exit ARP mode, simply press
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> the sequencer start/stop
>>>>>> button again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In ARP mode, any MIDI
>>>>>> received notes or played notes will be inserted into
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> the arpeggiator buffer. The
>>>>>> notes will not be immediately played but
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> instead, will be inserted
>>>>>> into the arpeggiator such that the notes
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> will be played out in
>>>>>> sequence according to the arpeggiator clock rate
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> (based upon either on board
>>>>>> sequencer rate or MIDI clock rate). So if you
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> were to hit four notes at
>>>>>> once then each one would be played out on
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> subsequent note ticks. The
>>>>>> notes would be played out in order according to
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> the sweep mode.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The arpeggiator user settings
>>>>>> will be stored in global mode parameters and
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> will include the following:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ARP_SWEEP - 1=Up, 2=Down,
>>>>>> 3=Up/Down, 4=Down/Up, 5=FIFO, 6=random.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Up - plays the notes in an
>>>>>> upward sweep.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Down - plays the notes in a
>>>>>> downward sweep.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Up/Down - plays the notes in
>>>>>> an initial upward sweep followed by a downward
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> sweep and thereupon repeats.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Down/Up - plays the notes in
>>>>>> an initial downward sweep followed by an
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> upward sweep and thereupon
>>>>>> repeats.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> FIFO - plays the notes in the
>>>>>> order in which they were originally played.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Random - plays the notes in
>>>>>> random order.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ARP_RANGE - 0=none, 1=1
>>>>>> octave, 2=2 octaves, 3=3 octaves.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 0 - plays only the notes that
>>>>>> are played.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 - plays the played notes
>>>>>> and the same notes one octave higher.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 - plays the played notes
>>>>>> and the same notes one octave higher and one
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> octave lower.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3 - plays the played notes
>>>>>> along with one and two octaves higher and lower.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ARP_DELAY - 1-64 = number of
>>>>>> arp ticks to delay note off
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ARP_FORSTEP - 0=off, 1 thru
>>>>>> 128. On each arp tick skip forward this number
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> of arp notes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ARP_BACKSTEP - 0=off, 1 thru
>>>>>> 128. On each arp tick move backward this
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> number of arp notes
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ARP_REST - 0=off, 1 thru 128.
>>>>>> The number of arp notes to play before a rest
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> is played instead of the arp
>>>>>> note.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ARP_SINGLE - 1=play the
>>>>>> arpeggiator when 1 or more notes are played, 2=play
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> when 2 or more notes are
>>>>>> played.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, you can see that I am
>>>>>> trying to make the ARP behave in a way that
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> allows for some funky
>>>>>> stepping forward and backward as well as skipping on
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> sounding notes. What does
>>>>>> everyone think of those features?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------ --------- --------- ------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mailto:korgpolyex-fullfeat ured@yahoogroups .com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>