Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

Off Topic

...Electrohead


--- On Tue, 2/17/09, serotonic_sound <sero-tonic@...> wrote:

> From: serotonic_sound <sero-tonic@...>
> Subject: [korgpolyex] Re: Jupiter vs Poly
> To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 4:14 AM
> > Off-topic, but I rarely see someone corrected about
> multiple claims in 
> > a long post react in a non-defensive hostile manner. 
> Your response to 
> > being corrected was more impressive than getting the
> details about 
> > Jupiters right in the first place would have been.
> 
> Well, I always aim to impress...Any impression is a good
> impression right?  Oh no, wait, 
> that's "press" not "impression"...
> crap.
> 
> Anyway...I'm not exactly sure whether I just got hit
> with a backhanded compliment, or 
> more "non-defensive hostility", or a missing
> grammatical construct somewhere, or what...
> 
> but, whatever...no more Jupiter-speak on the korg
> board!...And get your facts straight 
> everyone...we don't wan't to piss off the synth
> gurus do we?
> 
> Still really digging this synth...it really likes to take
> over a mix though and I'm a bit 
> bummed that the "no-joystick-mod" only partially
> worked...but at least the pitch is 
> normal now and I don't have to transpose in my
> head...although I was kind of getting the 
> hang of it...
> 
> HI MOM!
> 
> Later y'all...
> -Tim
> 
> 
> 
> --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "zoinky420"
> <zoinky420@...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com,
> "serotonic_sound" <sero-tonic@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >...thanks for setting me straight.
> > > 
> > >
> > 
> > Off-topic, but I rarely see someone corrected about
> multiple claims in 
> > a long post react in a non-defensive hostile manner. 
> Your response to 
> > being corrected was more impressive than getting the
> details about 
> > Jupiters right in the first place would have been.
> >