> Off-topic, but I rarely see someone corrected about multiple claims in > a long post react in a non-defensive hostile manner. Your response to > being corrected was more impressive than getting the details about > Jupiters right in the first place would have been. Well, I always aim to impress...Any impression is a good impression right? Oh no, wait, that's "press" not "impression"... crap. Anyway...I'm not exactly sure whether I just got hit with a backhanded compliment, or more "non-defensive hostility", or a missing grammatical construct somewhere, or what... but, whatever...no more Jupiter-speak on the korg board!...And get your facts straight everyone...we don't wan't to piss off the synth gurus do we? Still really digging this synth...it really likes to take over a mix though and I'm a bit bummed that the "no-joystick-mod" only partially worked...but at least the pitch is normal now and I don't have to transpose in my head...although I was kind of getting the hang of it... HI MOM! Later y'all... -Tim --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "zoinky420" <zoinky420@...> wrote: > > --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "serotonic_sound" <sero-tonic@> > wrote: > > > >...thanks for setting me straight. > > > > > > Off-topic, but I rarely see someone corrected about multiple claims in > a long post react in a non-defensive hostile manner. Your response to > being corrected was more impressive than getting the details about > Jupiters right in the first place would have been. >
Message
Re: Jupiter vs Poly
2009-02-17 by serotonic_sound
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.