Well, at the moment, I still don't completely understand the EG's math. But I think what you're saying would be true.
Then the problem becomes how to fit it all into the remaining space in the three flash EEPROM's.
And I also don't feel like maintaining different versions of firmware, which I think would be necessary.
Give me a few more months and I'll see where we're at on this one.
Mike.
Then the problem becomes how to fit it all into the remaining space in the three flash EEPROM's.
And I also don't feel like maintaining different versions of firmware, which I think would be necessary.
Give me a few more months and I'll see where we're at on this one.
Mike.
From: Alex Drinkwater
To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 5:36:54 PM
Subject: Re: [korgpolyex] Velocity sensitive
To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 5:36:54 PM
Subject: Re: [korgpolyex] Velocity sensitive
On 10 Jan 2009, at 15:09, Michael Hawkins wrote:
Then on top of that, the envelopes are software driven too. There is a large amount of mathematics used to create those ADBSSRR envelopes.
Would it be worth implementing a switchable ADSR-only envelope system, if that would save cycles, and therefore speed up response-time?
a|x