Korg Poly800/EX800 Users group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Message

Re: [korgpolyex] How many potential customers out there?

2009-01-05 by Michael Hawkins

Hi Dave,

at the moment, there's no real need to revise the board because we haven't run out of space in the existing EEPROM's for the software that I have developed so far. If I ever get to develop a decent arpeggiator for the Poly then that situation may change.

But if you were to order the rev 1.3 board, the new feature planned for rev 1.4 will still be able to be installed onto the rev 1.3 board with a bit of modding. A mod of the mod so to speak.

So if I were you, I wouldn't wait around for rev 1.4. Especially since I may never develop or release the 1.4 board anyway. It's a matter of priorities and time and interest from the Poly 800 community. Interest which seems to be thinning out.

Mike




________________________________
From: David Mochen <davidmochen@...>
To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 5, 2009 1:30:43 PM
Subject: Re: [korgpolyex] How many potential customers out there?


Hi Mike,
 
I read something about a Rev 1.4 board, is this 
it?
 
dave
 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: korgpolyex800 
To: korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com 
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 2:28  PM
Subject: [korgpolyex] How many potential  customers out there?

Hi Poly fans,

I am completely out of the HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk  boards.

That means I need to order some more to keep some on  hand.

Marcus is patiently waiting for his two AtomaHawk kits. So I know  I
have to order at least two of those.

But I would like to hear from  anyone out there who might be reasonably
certain that they will be buying  either the HAWK-800 or the AtomaHawk
(or both :-) ) kits.

Please let  me know as soon as you can.

And many thanks to you all. Just selling  twenty HAWK-800 kits and 12
AtomaHawk kits has been very  rewarding.

Mike.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.