Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

That is precisely the case.

One master clock = One bend.

Just so you know, I did contemplate building a second master
oscillator. But then, I would also have to build a new pair of digital
to analog converters or atleast build a new sample and hold that would
split the existing pitch bend into two, one for each OSC.

The end result is that I decided I against because of CPU cycles and
hardware and I'll end up dead of old age before this is all over with.

So I figure I am going to build my own synth pretty soon.

Mike.

--- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Alex Drinkwater <the_voder@...> wrote:
>
> 
> On 15 Nov 2008, at 18:48, David Mochen wrote:
> 
> > Hi there Mike!
> >
> > Thanks for your reply. Glad to hear that DCO pitch can be controlled  
> > by EG3. Now the question is... hard-wired to both DCO's, or can the  
> > EG3 > pitch can be applied selectively on one of the DCOs?
> 
> I imagine the answer to that one is also 'no'. Since both oscillators'  
> pitch is locked to a single master oscillator, you're not going to be  
> able to alter the pitch of one of the oscillators in any way without  
> also changing the pitch of the other.
> 
> a|x
> 
> 
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: korgpolyex800
> > To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 2:45 PM
> > Subject: [korgpolyex] ARP, DCO and EG3
> >
> > HI Dave,
> >
> > no, the DCO's are operating using one master clock so you can't
> > modulate DCO1 separate from DCO2. Sorry about that.
> >
> > The HAWK-800 already allows you to apply EG3 (and 4 when I implement
> > it) to the DCO pitch. I must do a demo of that as it's very nice  
> > indeed.
> >
> > The ARP stays on the priority list.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "David Mochen" <davidmochen@>  
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Mike, I've been checking the completed features in the Hawk 800
> > site and am not sure about this:
> > >
> > > Can the LFOs be applied on a "per DCO" basis? Say, for instance, I
> > want to apply one specific LFO speed, depth, delay to just one of the
> > DCOs, NOT the two DCOs at the same time, or apply wildly different LFO
> > settings for each DCO on an independent basis. Please enlighten me,
> > since I'm really planning to order the Hawk and aTomaHawk kits.
> > >
> > > And, about the arp vs. sequencer debate: I'm all for the arp. And a
> > way to control DCO pitch with EG3 or EG4 , when available, not to
> > mention velocity sensitivity...
> > >
> > > Judging from the latest audio clips I can envision LOTS of potential
> > in our Korgs.
> > >
> > > thanks!
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Atom Smasher
> > > To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 3:38 AM
> > > Subject: [korgpolyex] OT - 303
> > >
> > >
> > > off topic, but since we've been talking about the TB-303, the
> > wikipedia
> > > page is entertaining - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_TB-303
> > >
> > > make sure to check out this section -
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_TB-303#External_links
> > > some of those links are totally nuts, like bach & mozart on a 303.
> > > hopefully they'll be of use in taking the hawk-800 "to the next
> > level".
> > >
> > > --
> > > ...atom
> > >
> > > ________________________
> > > http://atom.smasher.org/
> > > 762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > "If the world were merely seductive, that would be easy.
> > > If it were merely challenging, that would be no problem.
> > > But I arise in the morning torn between a desire to
> > > improve the world, and a desire to enjoy the world. This
> > > makes it hard to plan the day."
> > > -- E.B. White
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>