----- Original Message -----From: Atom SmasherSent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 3:38 AMSubject: [korgpolyex] OT - 303off topic, but since we've been talking about the TB-303, the wikipedia
page is entertaining - http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Roland_TB- 303
make sure to check out this section -
http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Roland_TB- 303#External_ links
some of those links are totally nuts, like bach & mozart on a 303.
hopefully they'll be of use in taking the hawk-800 "to the next level".
--
...atom
____________ _________ ___
http://atom. smasher.org/
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- -
"If the world were merely seductive, that would be easy.
If it were merely challenging, that would be no problem.
But I arise in the morning torn between a desire to
improve the world, and a desire to enjoy the world. This
makes it hard to plan the day."
-- E.B. White
Message
Re: [korgpolyex] OT - 303
2008-11-15 by David Mochen
Hi Mike, I've been checking the completed
features in the Hawk 800 site and am not sure about this:
Can the LFOs be applied on a "per DCO"
basis? Say, for instance, I want to apply one specific LFO speed, depth, delay
to just one of the DCOs, NOT the two DCOs at the same time, or apply wildly
different LFO settings for each DCO on an independent basis. Please enlighten
me, since I'm really planning to order the Hawk and aTomaHawk kits.
And, about the arp vs. sequencer debate:
I'm all for the arp. And a way to control DCO pitch with EG3 or EG4 , when
available, not to mention velocity sensitivity...
Judging from the latest audio clips I can
envision LOTS of potential in our Korgs.
thanks!
Dave
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.
