On Thu, 22 May 2008, zoinky420 wrote:
with the 1600x (and i think the original 1600) you can set the range of
the sliders to just about anything... 1-65535, 3-4, 1-9, 0-99... whatever.
but... the *resolution* will always be limited to 7 bytes. oh-well.
but yeah... i can do things with the 1600x that would be impossible with
just about any other production controller.
for testing out the 800mk3 software, i suspect that most/all of the
controllers you mentioned would do the job.
--
...atom
________________________
http://atom.smasher.org/
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest
of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest
good of everyone."
-- John Maynard Keynes
> BTW, the Behringer, unlike the JL Cooper and I think the Peavey, as=========================
> well, has all its controller ranges stuck at 0-127. So that's kind of
> annoying when you've got parameters in a synth like the Poly 800 that go
> from 1-9, or whatever. With the Fadermaster (and like I said, the 1600,
> too I think), you can set the range of the fader to match the ranges of
> the synth's parameters.
with the 1600x (and i think the original 1600) you can set the range of
the sliders to just about anything... 1-65535, 3-4, 1-9, 0-99... whatever.
but... the *resolution* will always be limited to 7 bytes. oh-well.
but yeah... i can do things with the 1600x that would be impossible with
just about any other production controller.
for testing out the 800mk3 software, i suspect that most/all of the
controllers you mentioned would do the job.
--
...atom
________________________
http://atom.smasher.org/
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest
of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest
good of everyone."
-- John Maynard Keynes