On Wed, 21 May 2008, bys_jhn wrote:
using passive components (similar to my other mods, with ease of
implementation and a small list of easy to find parts a high priority), i
haven't been able to get anything impressive along those lines.
what might work, is to break the connection carrying the signal you'd like
to overdrive (eg; audio input to filter) and insert some jacks to make an
insert loop, then insert a distortion pedal. i haven't tried it, but i've
got enough outboard effects that it's not high on my to-do list.
--
...atom
________________________
http://atom.smasher.org/
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"As a cryptography and computer security expert,
I have never understood the current fuss about
the open source software movement. In the
cryptography world, we consider open source
necessary for good security; we have for decades.
Public security is always more secure than
proprietary security. It's true for cryptographic
algorithms, security protocols, and security
source code. For us, open source isn't just a
business model; it's smart engineering practice."
-- Bruce Schneier, 15 Sep 1999
> how about a way to overdrive the vcf or vca?=====================
using passive components (similar to my other mods, with ease of
implementation and a small list of easy to find parts a high priority), i
haven't been able to get anything impressive along those lines.
what might work, is to break the connection carrying the signal you'd like
to overdrive (eg; audio input to filter) and insert some jacks to make an
insert loop, then insert a distortion pedal. i haven't tried it, but i've
got enough outboard effects that it's not high on my to-do list.
--
...atom
________________________
http://atom.smasher.org/
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"As a cryptography and computer security expert,
I have never understood the current fuss about
the open source software movement. In the
cryptography world, we consider open source
necessary for good security; we have for decades.
Public security is always more secure than
proprietary security. It's true for cryptographic
algorithms, security protocols, and security
source code. For us, open source isn't just a
business model; it's smart engineering practice."
-- Bruce Schneier, 15 Sep 1999