I'd definitely like to try to make it work. Does anyone have a ROM image of the MKII? The biggest difference seems to be the digital delay line instead of the chorus. --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "korgpolyex800" <korgpolyex800@...> wrote: > > Alex, > > I like your humour. :-) > > If I ever buy a MKII I will look at the design and see if it could be > fitted into it. > > But the kit only works in the EX800 and Poly MK1. It does not work in > the MKII. Sorry :-( > > Mike. > > --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "Alexander" <arf_hotdogdeity@> > wrote: > > > > People spend a lot more than that on glitchy hardware. Look at the > > SIDStation. It's a crashy glitchy mess but people still bought them :) > > > > I want one of these for my MKII :) > > > > --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@> > > wrote: > > > > > > The only name I have on those first five boards is Mike! LOL > > > > > > But if they work straight out of the box, which would be a miracle, > > then you never know what your luck might be. :-) > > > > > > I'm certainly glad my kit is getting so much attention. The real > > question is going to be "how many people want to spend 100 bucks on a > > kit that gives you glitchy portamento mono mode"? > > > > > > Mike. > > > > > > Marcus Wilson <JB@> wrote: have you > > got names against those 5 boards yet? > > > > > > > > > If not, I would like to be included in the first batch > > > > > > > > > best regards, > > > > > > > > > Marcus Wilson > > > > > > On 11/12/2007, at 9:57 PM, korgpolyex800 wrote: > > > > > > Hi Atom, > > > > > > I agree with everything you said. > > > > > > i) I'll keep portamento even if it is glitchy. > > > ii) I'll change the Poly key to be the mode key so that each time you > > > press the Poly key you switch to the next mode (Poly, Chord, Hold, > > > Mono, Poly...). > > > iii) there will be CC's to change the mode too. > > > iv) for visual indication P for poly is already used so we need to > > > come up with a letter that would indicate portamento mono mode. I > > > thought "S" would work but it looks like a "5". Anyone got any > > > suggestions? > > > > > > Further testing last night revealed that the bend is so slow to react > > > to changes at higher slide rates that the portamento rapidly turns > > > into stepped DCO semitone changes. So it sounds best at really slow > > > rates where you glide from one octave to another over a period of 5 to > > > 10 seconds. Even then you can still hear the little glitches. My last > > > option now is to try to speed up the master clock reaction to bend > > > changes and try to improve the sample and hold circuit. I wish I had a > > > frequency counter and oscilloscope right now. > > > > > > But, when I run into walls like this I take a break so that I can come > > > back to it with a fresh perspective so I think I'll leave it all alone > > > as I have other pressing work to do. > > > > > > Wish those 5 boards would get here soon. > > > > > > Mike. > > > > > > --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Atom Smasher <atom@> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, korgpolyex800 wrote: > > > > > > > > > I could rewrite the code to toggle between Poly and mono mode > > > using the > > > > > Poly key. Another way might be to make the Poly key the selector > > for > > > > > Poly, Mono, Chord and Hold mode. Each time you press the poly key > > > would > > > > > move you into the next mode. That would free up the chord and > hold > > > > > buttons to be used for selecting global mode and extended > parameter > > > > > entry modes (or other things if we decide to add more). > > > > > > > > > > What do you all think? > > > > ================================ > > > > > > > > that would work, since the modes are (or can be) exclusive... > > > probably not > > > > everyone on the list has a PC1600 (or similar), but i'd be happy as > > > long > > > > as i can select the modes using standard MIDI CCs. do you think > > > you'd be > > > > able to provide visual indication of which mode is currently > selected? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I now need to determine if the glitch is caused by the master > clock > > > > > being incapable of tracking the output of the DAC when a square > > wave > > > > > edge change occurs in the bend or if the DAC sample hold circuit > > > is too > > > > > slow. If it's just the sample and hold then I may be able to > > > reduce the > > > > > sample hold capacitor to improve the highest possible rate of > > > change. If > > > > > it is due to the master clock not being able to change frequencies > > > fast > > > > > then I think we might be out of luck. So much so that the only > > way to > > > > > get good portamento would be to build a new master clock that was > > > able > > > > > to slide the full five octaves. > > > > ================== > > > > > > > > maybe you'll come up with a different way to approach the problem..? > > > > > > > > even if it's glitchy, i'm sure it's still usable... i was just > > > talking to > > > > tom (the guy who i made the first moog-slayer for) and he > reminded me > > > > about a patch i wrote for him on a CZ-101... listening to it > > > straight from > > > > the CZ it sounded kinda cold and very digital, but in the > > foreground of > > > > the mix and with some reverb (we probably used a BOSS SE-50) it > > sounded > > > > sweet and analog and warm and huge. years later it still impressed > > > him. so > > > > i'd be interested in it even if it is glitchy... > > > > > > > > and if you "fix" it in a later release, leave the option of > using the > > > > glitchy version... seriously... one never knows what genres of music > > > might > > > > be formed from an obscure glitch... > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > ...atom > > > > > > > > ________________________ > > > > http://atom.smasher.org/ > > > > 762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808 > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > "What luck for rulers, that men do not think." > > > > -- Adolf Hitler > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. > > > > > >
Message
Re: Enabling portamento mono mode
2007-12-14 by Alexander
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.
