Korg Poly800/EX800 Users group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

Index last updated: 2026-04-13 23:51 UTC

Message

Re: [korgpolyex] Re: Unison

2007-07-15 by Atom Smasher

On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, korgpolyex800 wrote:

> I think we definitely want to keep the existing MG and LFO but add a 
> second LFO that has square, sine, saw, reverse saw and triangle as well 
> as randomize. Plus an inverter.
>
> We will want to be able to route them to VCF cutoff, VCF resonance and 
> DCO freq (vibrato) and DCO volume (for lovely tremolo). Any others?
=============

how about making MG (LFO) 1 and 2 targets for MG (LFO) 2?

can detune be a target? or would it sound "zippery" because of the way 
that the detune is implemented?

if the new LFO 2 has an inverter, would it need a saw and reverse saw? or 
would the reverse saw really be handled by the inverter?

this may be overkill for a poly-800, but would the LFO 2 be free-running? 
trigger per note? re-trigger on each new note in a chord? my guess is that 
either of the first two options would be good; the third option would be 
not so good.


-- 
         ...atom

  ________________________
  http://atom.smasher.org/
  762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
  -------------------------------------------------

 	"The sum of intelligence on the planet is a constant.
 	 The population is increasing."
 		-- Cole's Axiom

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.