88 note range? I will check the progress page more often. Never thought of that. It's a great feature! >From: "korgpolyex800" <korgpolyex800@...> >Reply-To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com >To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [korgpolyex] Re: Two different retrofit kit >Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:56:15 -0000 > >Hi Kokoon, > >I miss my SH-101 for just that reason. > >I spent some time thinking about how to do, as you so appropriately >put it, "decent portamento". At one point I was looking at using the >existing master DCO bend circuit to create the portamento but I fear >that might not give us a "decent" portamento and I just know it's >going take a lot of programming time to make it work. Another way to >do portamento would be to build a brand new master DCO that was able >to sweep across the entire 88 note keyboard (did I mention that I'm >going to provide full 88 key range as an selectable parameter?). But >such a master DCO will require even more circuitry so it will >definitely have to go into the full retrofit kit. I may try to use the >bend circuit first and see what sort of results I get, if they are >"decent" then perhaps we can avoid adding more hardware. > >Isn't this fun! > >Mike. > >--- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "jure zitnik" <kokoon@...> wrote: > > > > all i'm interested in is a decent mono mode with portamento :) > > > > cheers, > > kokoon > > > > On 4/12/07, korgpolyex800 <korgpolyex800@...> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Well, if there's one thing I've learned it's that you should never use > > > polls to make decisions because you can be sure that poll questions > > > were written and scripted by an idiot. > > > > > > OK, down to business. > > > > > > After looking at the poll results and seeing some of the responses I > > > was prompted to rethink the goals of the project. Taking into > > > consideration all of the work I've done so far and the progress made > > > it would be possible to take all of the new sysex functions (and more) > > > and put them into ROM space if we could add just one additional 8K > > > ROM. The challenge is to add that ROM without requiring major surgery > > > on the hardware. Well it turns out that a small board that would use > > > two 8K ROM's and one XOR logic gate chip could be made that would map > > > the second ROM into the same address space as the existing RAM. The > > > second ROM would be disabled for the low 2K of address space where the > > > 2K RAM exists. This would mean that we would end up with 14K or ROM > > > instead of the existing 8K. The only problem with this concept is that > > > we don't get any additional RAM at all. This would mean that any new > > > sysex commands would have to be wedged into the existing RAM in such > > > as way as to not stomp all over the existing programming. I'll have to > > > do some testing to see what scratch RAM is available in that little 2K > > > RAM chip. > > > > > > Then, there is the big retrofit project. This will give us so much > > > additional RAM, ROM and other hardware that we'll be able to transform > > > the Poly 800 and EX800 into something much more than we could ever > > > have imagined. It requires removing one IC and adding a much larger > > > plug in board. It will include two flash EEPROM's which means we'll be > > > able to download new code as it becomes available. And it will have > > > many new performance parameters and operational capabilities. > > > > > > I think perhaps I should go for the easier retrofit kit first and go > > > from there. > > > > > > Mike. > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ Descubra como mandar Torpedos do Messenger para o celular! http://mobile.msn.com/
Message
RE: [korgpolyex] Re: Two different retrofit kit
2007-04-13 by Jose Curvo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.
