Korg Poly800/EX800 Users group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:27 UTC

Message

Re: [korgpolyex] Re: Mod questions

2007-03-28 by David Mochen

Yes, the mistake is the removal of the C103 and inverting polarity.
The 100k pot will allow a transition between filter slopes. I wouldn't implement it myself since most usual way in history of synths has been toggling between them rather than fading... A pot takes up more room as well than a switch.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: satnom2000
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 1:07 PM
Subject: [korgpolyex] Re: Mod questions

--- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "David Mochen" ...> wrote:
>
> Hi Satnom. As for the audio input, Marco's explanation will do. I
havent got here the exact link i follwoed (it was one old post in this
same NG). When I get home ill email it to you.

Thank you. I appreciate.

>
> However, as regards 12/24, please check one of my latest posts,
since the post linked in Marco's page has a mistake that will render
the synth virtually mute AFAIK....

Is the mistake is to remove all of the C103, I think we have to just
cut the positive leg, Am I right? And also, what do you think of this
idea of mounting a 100k pot in place of the switch?

> YOu'll find a diagram for 12/24 in my post. REal easy.

I already got it. Thanks again and sorry for all those questions.

Bernard

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.