Shit, if you can find a JUNO 106 for less than $200 bucks, then I'd recommend getting that instead anyways. The JUNO-106 far outweights the Poly800 in every regard. Or perhaps you meant some other JUNO? --- jure zitnik <kokoon@...> wrote: > yeah i voted 100$ too. i mean.. i bought the > poly-800 for like 70$... in > perfect condition that is. with a case. > > jure > > On 5/24/06, Tim Bieniosek <tab27@...> wrote: > > > > > > What if you added a DB9 or DB25 port on the back > for an external knob box? > > > > The most I'd pay for a kit is $100. After that > you can just buy a Juno. > > (sacrilege!) > > > > > > > > On Wed, 24 May 2006, patrioticduo wrote: > > > > > I did entertain the idea of replacing the seven > segment displays with > > > a 2x24 backlit LCD. But even that is too much to > spend. > > > > > > However, I am planning on putting an LCD > interface onto the retrofit > > > kit so that I can plug a display in and do > diagnostics with it. Also, > > > I have a funny feeling that I may have to use > the LCD to determine the > > > exact memory map used for all the parameters and > patch space use. > > > > > > But the cost of the LCD would be too high for > any retrofit kit. I > > > mean, when you can pick up all sorts of much > higher powered > > > synthesizers for a few hundred bucks what would > the point of it all be? > > > > > > This upgrade is 90% ROM and RAM. A few digital > pots will allow > > > controlling some mod's but I simply refuse to > entertain carving up the > > > keyboard, drilling holes and messing with the > external appearance. > > > This mod is going to be an internal upgrade. No > messing up a great > > > looking vintage keyboard. > > > > > > I want mine to look like a Poly 800 for my > grandchildren. > > > > > > --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Marcus Wilson > <JB@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > Speaking of new features, one thing i was > thinking would be uber cool > > > > would be to actually display the parameter > info in the decal showing > > > > the parameters and ranges, and having up/down > switches under the up/ > > > > down parameter switch area. As my own > experience is in membrane > > > > switches, getting the switch side of things is > pretty simple, its the > > > > control and the multiplex/demultiplex of the > parameter info display > > > > that got too hard. > > > > > > > > Imagine seeing all of the parameters on the > poly displayed, and being > > > > able to tweak each one at will, instead of > needing to fumble thru the > > > > parameters one at a time > > > > > > > > JB over > > > > > > > > On 24/05/2006, at 3:19 PM, jure zitnik wrote: > > > > > > > > > if you're planning the digital pot - why not > replace the awkward up/ > > > > > down buttons with a rotary encoder? i guess > it's an easy job! > > > > > > > > > > jure > > > > > > > > > > On 5/23/06, patrioticduo <patrioticduo@...> > wrote: > > > > > I'm trying to keep the scope within the > realms of sanity. > > > > > > > > > > So I'm placing initial limits on the > hardware upgrade. > > > > > > > > > > Required outcome: Upgrade the Poly 800 RAM > and ROM to support > > > > > additional CPU programming related > functions. A board will be > > > > > developed as part of a retrofit kit that > will plug into the existing > > > > > ROM socket. The card will have a 2764 EPROM, > a 6264 RAM, a 74LS138 > > > > > decoder. > > > > > > > > > > Optional outcome: Provide the needed > hardware to integrate several > > > > > well established mod's (moog slayer, 12/24db > filter switch, etc) > > into > > > > > the CPU control and user programming system. > Thus, add a 74H174 (6 > > bit > > > > > latch) and a digital potentiometer and other > chips as needed to > > allow > > > > > existing and future mod's to be controlled > by the CPU. > > > > > > > > > > I think it very unlikely that we'll run out > of CPU cycles handling > > the > > > > > required outcomes. I think it possible that > we may run into CPU > > cycle > > > > > restrictions trying to satisfy the optional > outcomes. > > > > > > > > > > If we do find that we run out of CPU cycles > then I'm hoping that > > I'll > > > > > know so much about the code that I can port > the whole thing to a PC > > > > > and release a virtual Poly 800 that will run > on your Linux box. > > > > > > > > > > Mike H. > > > > > > > > > > --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, > "austeritygirlone" <ziggystar@> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, > "patrioticduo" <patrioticduo@> > > > > > > > > > > > > Keep up the good work! After you've > figured out how to controll > > the > > > > > > peripheral synthstuff from the cpu and > written a basic OS, that > > gets > > > > > > somethingn done I'm sure that other people > will join your efforts > > > > > > (like me). But of course doing this is a > major obstacle. > > > > > > > > > > > > And have you thought about replacing the > CPU by a more modern > > > > > > pincompatible version with more RAM, ROM > and more MHz? I know that > > > > > > this is possible with the Roland JX-3P CPU > (some Intel thing). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SPONSORED LINKS > > > > > Music sampler Music synthesizers > Synthesizer music > > > > > Sampler > > > > > > > > > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "korgpolyex" on the web. > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an > email to: > > > > > korgpolyex-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the > Yahoo! Terms of Service > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > > > > > > > > > Visit your group "korgpolyex" on the web. > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an > email to: > > > > > korgpolyex-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the > Yahoo! Terms of > > Service. > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [korgpolyex] Re: Disassembly update - II
2006-06-16 by Joseph Ralston
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.