For example, there will still only be 16 steps for the resonance parameter, so there will be audible "steps" even though you are controlling it with a knob, contrary to an analogue synth knob which is mostly a real potentiometer. An analogue knob will have an infinite number of steps while the digital ones are limited to the "resolution" of the chips. This isn't really a problem for me, as I was mostly thinking about using the knob to make new patches fast with immediate results, while most of you seem interested in using it "live". --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "guillaume richard" <kaneelisdead@h...> wrote: > here is an answer i got: > > "hmmm.. replacing digital buttons with knobs MIGHT be possible to do with > rotary encoder knobs... > but it wont give you smooth analog operating ranges or anything.." > > The last sentence is chinese to me tho :D > > > >From: "Phoebe October" <october71@g...> > >Reply-To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com > >To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com > >Subject: [korgpolyex] Re: Parameter wheel > >Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:09:11 -0000 > > > >--- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "Philip Linde" <philip.linde@t...> > >wrote: > > > Hello! > > > Maybe you guys know anyone who can make anything out of this > > > information: http://www.interq.or.jp/japan/se-inoue/e_ckt10_3.htm. I > > > wouldn't know, but it kind of looks like what I expected the solution > > > to be. > > > >Aha...I was never exactly sure how a rotary encoder worked until now. > >Then again, I never really looked into it either. It seems to me that > >the rotary encoder + the up-down detection circuit would fit the bill. > >I may have to give it a try once I start working on modifying my poly800. > > > >Yes, I have some circuit knowledge (but not a ton)...I make and modify > >things. > > > >cya! > >phoebe aka october71 > >www.soundclick.com/october71 > > > >
Message
Re: Parameter wheel
2005-08-03 by Philip Linde
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.