Also, I get some -47 when the volume isn't even at max. So I'll give a try to these OPA4228, and the 2 chan version in some preamps and DACs. --- In k5synth@yahoogroups.com, antdes45@n... wrote: > My mixer plugged to the line in gives me -55 and my K5 plugged to the line in gives me -55 too. I did the 147k hack but with 150k ones, I got a problem: the last 1/12 boosts the volume x3, and when I switch up and down from the 11/12 to the 12/12 part, I hear a pop between them(BTW it doesn't distort, except for crappy low W headphones. > > "nelsonj_sce" <nelsonj_sce@y...> wrote: > > > > >OK - I am note sure this is an apples-to-apples test but here is what > >I did. I have a Yamaha DSP2416 mixer in my computer. I hooked up my > >K5 to the mixer and then read the levels from the mixer. > > > >I did all tests while my K5 was in multi mode, I tested both the "mix" > >output and the "1" output and turned the mixer channel on my computer > >all the way up. I did not hit any notes, so I was just looking at the > >noise level, and I did not run through any FX or noise gates, I just > >ran the K5 direct to the mixer. > > > >Results: > > > >1) With the K5 volume at minimum I was below -72dB on both "mix" and > >"1" outputs. This was the same reading as when the K5 was not even > >plugged in, so there was no additional noise. > > > >2)With the K5 volume at MAX, the "Mix" output was just above -66dB and > >the "1" output was just above -72dB. NOTE: I did the 147k resistor > >hack, so my MAX output is much hotter than a stock K5. > > > >I am not sure how my K5 would do if I used the same setup you used, > >but this was the best I could do with the equipment I have. I hope > >this helps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >--- In k5synth@yahoogroups.com, Antoine Deschênes <antdes45@n...> wrote: > >> Could you do a little VU meter test, with mix output if you have > >changed > >> the opamp for it(The same opamp is for headphones) or single if not, > >> without a noise gate or anything else at minimum volume? I'd like to > >> know how many dBs is it now.(I sat my SBLive VOL adj. at -90dB on > >the VU > >> meter(Software) without anything plugged in the Live, then plugged the > >> K5 in the Line In and i got a -47dB. > >> > >> nelsonj_sce@y... a écrit: > >> > >> > > >> > Hack update: > >> > Since my last note I replaced the other two op-amps with socketed Burr > >> > Brown OPA4228. Replacing these two other op-amps did reduce noise > >> > levels noticeably. There is still some noise but with 1)the these > >> > four super clean op-amps, 2)using Multi, 3)routing everything to a > >> > sinlge output on the multi rather than mix, and 4)using my noise gate, > >> > noise is really not an issue any more. I would love to try and > >> > replace the VCAs also, but I have not been able to track down a spec > >> > sheet (or any other info on the) on them so I do not have a clue as > >> > what might works as an upgraded part. > >> > > >> > If anyone can help, the VCAs are part M5222L and they are from > >> > the same off-brand Japanese JRC company that is used elsewhere in the > >> > K5. If anyone can help me with details on the M5222Ls I will see if I > >> > can find a replacement parts. > >> > > >> > My bottom line: If you are willing to lay-out $30 for the four BB > >> > OPA4228 and sockets, and you if you are willing to remove some > >> > tough-to-remove parts, I highly recommend this op-amp replacement > >> > hack. My K5 has much less noise and just sounds much warmer/classier > >> > with the new parts. I would love remove more noise, but right now it > >> > sounds very good and I am not very motivate to continue hacking. (I > >> > do still plan on replacing the headphone circuit though since I > >> > already made the new circuit and all I have to do is wire it up.) > >> > > >> > An interesting aside: After I did the latest op-amp replacement, > >> > everything sounded great in multi, but when I went to single I had > >> > serious problems. Various ranges of the keyboard worked fine, while > >> > other ranges sounds like a fried amp circuit. It turns out that while > >> > I was removing IC8 I accidentally pulled part of the circuit board > >> > trace off that connected pins 1 and 2 on IC8. This trace provides the > >> > feedback loop between the (-) and output of line G2. Once I tracked > >> > down the problem I was able to reconnect pins 1 and 2 and then > >> > everything in single mode worked great. What I conclude from this is > >> > that the K5 in single mode is splitting different ranges of the > >> > keyboard to different op-amps. I am not sure what K% is doing in > >> > multi but multi (ouput 1) DOES NOT use the opamp in IC8 pins 1-2-3. > >> > > >> > Hack on. > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> antdes45@n... > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Antoine Deschênes > aka DragonMaster > http://thehotcom.deep-ice.com/ > Files:http://angelfire.com/ca7/hotcomcenter/ > > > __________________________________________________________________ > Switch to Netscape Internet Service. > As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register > > Netscape. Just the Net You Need. > > New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer > Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups. > Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp
Message
Re: Notes on Schems...update on grounding experiment
2004-11-11 by antdes45dragonmaster
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.