thanks Rob--great info Best way to get spare SSM chip for E2 is to buy a Oberheim DPX1 on Ebay I assume? Now how many SSM S3528 switched capacitors does the E2 use? thanks David On 4/10/2008, at 5:00 AM, rob wrote: > Hi > I agree with Brian, and there are other E3 problems... > > SIMM sockets in first batch were bad - many early E2's were recalled > secretly > Hard disk in first batch were troublesome > Burr Brown DAC's can fail and are expensive > Card frame is a mistake - it was designed to be expandable by > marketing > SCSI cable runs are too long in keyboard version > Removing cards can strip components off nearby boards, especially > polystyrene caps > Inserting jacks into stereo outs can blow a variety of components > Needs alignment and maintenance every year > 16 channel TTL based microcontroller just pushes the boundaries of > dense TTL > and all that heat - what an idea! > Rack version is considerably more reliable , as its later and has > the card > frame vertically - shorter SCSI cable too > If you love your E3 get a second for spares and an expander board. I > sold my > E3's long ago - too much hassle. > > E2 is prone to rare chip failure - S3528 switched capacitor and SSM > filter > chip. These are hard to find, so buy some now as spares! > E2 power supply overheats the PCB's and then voices cut out. Power > supply > often fails but is repairable > E2 hard disk is now well past its life. > Molex interconnects can fail > I'd replace the Tantumlum bypass caps, as they are 25 years old and > will die > causing more problems > Other than that its pretty much ok and uses sensible parts and a > good 2 PCB > layout. > > The E3 product quality failure was significant in 1988 and E-mu > Systems > nearly went out of business as a direct result. They unfortunately > over > reacted and introduced Japanese TQM. This reduced innovation is such a > small company, and meant senior managers would not approve any > further mega > projects for many years...hence the Proteus was born..Its why the > was a big > gap until the E4 arrived, as the E3 exapnsion plans were axed and > only a 2x > Emax II (the E3XP) was eventually built. > > Positive side was Dave Rossum created more custom ASIC chips to > improve > relaibility. Ahhh the G Chip ! > > All the best > Rob > www.emulatorarchive.com > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [emulatorII-list] Emulator 2 vs 3 for realiability
2008-10-03 by David
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.