Hi I agree with Brian, and there are other E3 problems... SIMM sockets in first batch were bad - many early E2's were recalled secretly Hard disk in first batch were troublesome Burr Brown DAC's can fail and are expensive Card frame is a mistake - it was designed to be expandable by marketing SCSI cable runs are too long in keyboard version Removing cards can strip components off nearby boards, especially polystyrene caps Inserting jacks into stereo outs can blow a variety of components Needs alignment and maintenance every year 16 channel TTL based microcontroller just pushes the boundaries of dense TTL and all that heat - what an idea! Rack version is considerably more reliable , as its later and has the card frame vertically - shorter SCSI cable too If you love your E3 get a second for spares and an expander board. I sold my E3's long ago - too much hassle. E2 is prone to rare chip failure - S3528 switched capacitor and SSM filter chip. These are hard to find, so buy some now as spares! E2 power supply overheats the PCB's and then voices cut out. Power supply often fails but is repairable E2 hard disk is now well past its life. Molex interconnects can fail I'd replace the Tantumlum bypass caps, as they are 25 years old and will die causing more problems Other than that its pretty much ok and uses sensible parts and a good 2 PCB layout. The E3 product quality failure was significant in 1988 and E-mu Systems nearly went out of business as a direct result. They unfortunately over reacted and introduced Japanese TQM. This reduced innovation is such a small company, and meant senior managers would not approve any further mega projects for many years...hence the Proteus was born..Its why the was a big gap until the E4 arrived, as the E3 exapnsion plans were axed and only a 2x Emax II (the E3XP) was eventually built. Positive side was Dave Rossum created more custom ASIC chips to improve relaibility. Ahhh the G Chip ! All the best Rob www.emulatorarchive.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [emulatorII-list] Emulator 2 vs 3 for realiability
2008-10-03 by rob
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.