After researching this a bit, I determined that the p3 ready made is the way to go. Can't afford a Zeit (or Phaedra) at this point. --- In elektron-users@yahoogroups.com, "Gert van Santen" <g.vansanten@c...> wrote: > droolmaster0 wrote: > > Coincidentally, this sequencer was discussed on Analog Heaven > > recently. A comment from someone who used one: > > > > "Yes, I've seen it, played with it and played with it last year at > > frankfurt > > when it was still a beta product. > > Its not bad, its bascially a 4 channel 16 step sequencer. > > Each channel has 8 'layers', each layer can be note length, velocity, > > note, > > CC and so on. > > So you can have one channel playing a polyphonic part using 3 layers, > > another layer for Velocity, another for note length and so on, upto 8 > > layers, per channel. > > Nice interface, though I would rather have had all 16 in one line, 8 > > above > > another 8 isn't intuitive, IMHO. > > > > The down side(s)? > > You can't build up 'songs' but you can queue patterns and switch them. > > the BIG limitation, you can't change what a layer does whilst its > > playing. > > For example, you're mid gig and you decide you want to add some CC > > control > > to change filter cutoff. > > You can't, you have to STOP the sequencer, change that 'layers' > > function and > > restart.. not cool. > > The P3 and Zeit both manage this, so why can't 1600 euros worth of > > sequencer? > > Thats the other point, a 2U sequencer doesn't look/feel like its > > worth 1600 > > Euros.." > > > > Thanx, excellent post. Makes me think... > > :-) > > Gert > www.waveworld.tv
Message
Re: MonoMachine versus other sequencers
2004-04-08 by droolmaster0
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.