On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 21:05:40 +0300, daniel_elektron <daniel@...> wrote: >> but SRR isn't alias-free either. > > No, the whole point with SRR is to introduce aliasing. Alias free SRR > would just simply be a low pass filter, right? Well, yes and no. Normally you would apply alias-filter *before* the decimation (the actual SRR), but you can also apply it afterwards. For example, if I have a rapid sin wave, it turns into random-like square wave with large amount of SRR. But the result is aliased, the square wave is not bandwidth-limited if the playback is not interpolated in anyway. Same with the bit-depth reduction. So doing the SRR in high sampling rate and with aliasing filter afterwards ensures alias-free waveform. May sound stupid as the whole meaning of the SRR is to degrade the quality of the signal. But there is a small difference nonetheless :) In fact, I take my words back. It would take more inspection to tell whether the result in MM's SRR produces aliased waveforms or not. And it isn't probably even worth it. Btw, daniel. Can you comment on my question about the lfos with hold?... Cheers, Sampsa
Message
Re: [elektron] Feature request: bit reduction effect and lfo mode
2006-04-27 by Sampsa Lehtonen
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.