Dotcomformat

Hi John,

I just want to mention that I have a decent sized dotcom, but I 
really had to add some of the cool MOTM filters to my setup. 

http://danacountryman.com/Studio9_1_04.jpg

I have three of them, so far. They each have their own unique 
personality that I couldn't get with the dotcom filters.
I'm also in the process of retrofitting my Moogerfooger Lo-Pass 
filter into dotcom panel format, thanks to the Stooge Boys.

You'll love your dotcom, and it's not that hard to add other maker's 
products in, for more flexibility.

Onward,

- Dana 

http://www.danacountryman.com

--- In dotcomformat@yahoogroups.com, jkn@j... wrote:
> 
> Ha - advert or not I'm glad you posted it.  One of my biggest 
issues is I
> want my modular more for sound shaping/mangling/etc than as an 
actual
> synth (although I want that too... I want everything... I'm selfish 
that
> way... ;-)
> 
> I love just about everything about the dotcom that I've read and am 
happy
> with my decision to go this route when I get to the point where I 
order
> (no - I don't own one yet, a couple months out yet before 
the "first"
> order).    What excites me about MOTM is the variety of filters.   
I'm not
> really hung up on the sealed pots and best of everything approach 
(though
> I certainly respect everyone who wants that) - the cost difference 
between
> MOTM and dotcom is substantial.   However, when I get my dotcom to a
> certain point - I know I'll want to add at least couple of the MOTM
> filters and possibly other modules - and the possibility of getting 
them
> in dotcom format is just perfection.   Hopefully, by the time I'm 
ready to
> add those, all the groundwork will be in place.  :-)
> 
> Honestly, between the dotcom and MOTM lists - I've had more fun 
thinking
> about gear and synths the last few months (and planning out what I 
want to
> get and what I want to do with it) than I have with music in a long 
time. 
>  Between integrating a patchbay into my studio (yes, believe it or 
not - I
> don't have one...) and planning the modular - this has been a 
potentially
> expensive year!   I rarely add gear - this year has been an 
exception - I
> added a pair of Mackie monitor's earlier as well.
> 
> I'll quit rambling...
> 
> John K-N
> 
> 
> > Old uncle Larry will have the Time Machine panels in his hands 
today.
> >  YES! Finally.  Hopefully if everyone is happy with these, we can
> > work out more designs.  We have over 80 designs in productions 
right
> > now, but only 3 of them are currently in the dot com format.  And,
> > due to the fixed cost of setting up a screen and such, it is much
> > chpeaer per unit, if you have at least 3 or 4 instead of just one.
> > They keep getting cheaper up through about 20.
> >
> > I have had many requests for MOTM filters and Blacet products.  
Both
> > can be great compliments to fill in the blanks in Dot Com land 
like
> > has been done in MOTM land.  In fact, the MOTM panels should be 
bolt
> > and unbolt.  But for those not wanting to do any work, I am 
working
> > on a deal with Paul S. to have him do the entire build but use the
> > dot com style panel instead for those that want to buy them that 
way.
> >
> > Sorry, I did not mean to sound like an advertisement.  But, Scott
> > brought it up. :-)
> >
> > Larry H.  I'll shut up now.
> >