okay then. I'm not that used to +/- supply layouts. I remember the
following 'text' diagram as ground:
|
|
-----
---
-
That's how I missed it. Does Jim's test setup expect a bipolar (+/-)
supply or just a + supply? I'm guessing just the +12 if the symbol
above D.U.T. is ground.
Larry T.
following 'text' diagram as ground:
|
|
-----
---
-
That's how I missed it. Does Jim's test setup expect a bipolar (+/-)
supply or just a + supply? I'm guessing just the +12 if the symbol
above D.U.T. is ground.
Larry T.
--- In cgs_synth@yahoogroups.com, Dave Kendall <davekendall@...> wrote:
>
> Larry asked the question I didn't dare, lest I got categorized as being
> in permanent blonde mode....
> Relieved to see it wasn't only me that wondered....
>
> Seeing as the bottle of peroxide is on the table now, does anyone else
> find the use of a downward pointing arrow for GND instead of -V as
> confusing as I do when it sometimes turns up in a schemo?
> Is there a good reason for it?
>
> "Standards are marvellous, That's why we have so many of them......."
>
> :-)
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> On 8 Jun 2007, at 16:08, Louis van Dompselaar wrote:
>
> > The "D.U.T." is in a confusing place. It is meant to indicate
> > the transistor in the diagram. The arrow that it is next to is just
> > the ground connection.
> >