Yea! I've already upgraded the power supply for my studio system in
anticipation... so I'm ready on this end.
If you need an idea of depth... here's a pic of the dotcom TM from the
side... so you can see that the TM would not fit in the bottom row of a 44-slant
(or top of an inverted 44-slant). This little detail caused me to have to
re-arrange a significant quantity of modules (having two TM's), and I ended-up
selling both (re-arranged again). So yeah, I guess I would need whatever
adapters you are doing to handle the depth-issue.
~Morbius~
----- Original Message -----From: Cynthia WebsterSent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 12:47 PMSubject: Re: Dotcom cab. slant - Re: [The_Cyndustries_List] Update~Morbius~ wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Cynthia Webster <mailto:cynthia.webster@gte.net>
> *To:* The_Cyndustries_List@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:The_Cyndustries_List@yahoogroups.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 15, 2006 1:17 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [The_Cyndustries_List] Update
>
> DotCom Zo Observations
>
> There is also a clearance issue on the portable versions of the
> Synthesizers.com
> cabinets where again, the mighty ZOis only fractions of an inch - too
> deep to fit.
> Here we will also supply a small right angle adapter board to
> create the
> proper
> ; clearance, (portable cabinets only) the standard walnut
> Synthesizers.com
> cabinets
> are no problem.
>
>
> Cynthia
>
>
> Hey Cynth (or should I say Synth)(sorry)
>
> When you say 'not' the walnut cabinets.... have you checked the
> bottom row of the 44-cabinet (slant)? There are other modules which
> won't fit in the bottom row because of the angle vs. module depth
> issue. Remember- that's not a 90-degree angle. The Blacet Time Machine
> (in dotcom format) comes to mind.
>
> ~Morbius~
Thank You Morby!
It's little details such as this that are enormously helpful for us to know.
Thanks for your feedback!
We anticipate that our Dotcom flavored Zeroscillators should be shipping
in about thirty days! Hooray!
Cynthia