Thanks, Cynthia. I found the trimpot easily. I ended up with a setting close to the original factory setting. But I was not able to fix a problem of the ZO tracking sharp in the lower octaves of the high range. I started down this calibration road because I noticed that the ZO and the MOTM-300 being used as the FM source in the starter ZO patch were not tracking each other well. The beats were quite noticable. I spent a couple of hours taking measurements, after setting the 1V/oct trimpot. Here's what I found. I measured with a digital voltmeter and a digital frequency counter. For comparison I performed the same tests on the MOTM-300 VCO. The results were all obtained by the same method and instruments, using the same power supply. I created a 1V source by a mixer with bias (my own mixer-comparator) and measured for 1V at the 1V/oct input jack. For each reading I dialed up a frequency, applied 1 volt and recorded the new frequency, which ideally is double for the next octave. For the ZO I did this in all four combinations of High/Low Bias and High/Mid range. I only measured what I could dial up that started in the audio range. Each number pair below represents the HZ value before and after, so 30/60 means 30HZ/60HZ. Low Bias/Mid Range 30/60 - right on 60/119.8 Low Bias/High Range 30/66 60/123.2 120/241.5 240/480 - right on 480/957 High Bias/Low Range 30/60.2 60/120 - right on 120/239.7 240/478.4 High Bias/High Range 30/66 60/124 120/243 240/482 480/960 - right on 960/1916 1920/3825 MOTM-300 30/60 - right on 60/120 - right on 120/240 - right on 240/480 - right on 480/960 - right on 960/1918 1920/3834 The ZO tracking isn't bad, but it isn't great either. The ZO starts out on the low end tracking more than one octave per volt (sharp), passes the sweet spot and starts going flat gradually. By contrast the MOTM-300 tracks perfectly over about six octaves and then also start going a little flat. Now this flatness on the high end may be by design, due to psycho-acoustic effects, I seem to recall. I'm not a music VCO expert. But sharpness on the low end isn't good. For my ZO the tracking is accurate over at best about three octaves. The lower octaves track better in the low range and the higher octaves track better in the high range. This was a useful finding. Of course I tested only my own ZO, so I can't say whether this is the general character of a ZO or not. Still, I would be interested to hear from other ZO owners whether they are able to replicate my findings. -Richard Brewster http://www.pugix.com Cynthia Webster wrote: >Hi Richard! > >First, please be quite certain that it is the ZO and not rather >that another oscillator (or keyboard) in your system being slightly off... > >The Zeroscillator 1volt/octave trimmer is located on the top >board where the power plugs in. If you locate the logo >saying Cynthia CYN109-C and rotate the ZO so that this logo is >reading right side up, then the trimmer is the first one to the left, >(right after the Tempco). It is a multi-turm trimmer laying flat. > >The other two trimmers next to it are for shaping the sine wave. > >We also have a precision Volt to the Octave Calibration Gadget >in the works as a new product which should help tune-up all of >the oscillators and keyboards in any system. > >We're planning a revision to the manual soon to include more >infoon the power connector, and the trimmers etc, but we've been >way busy building Zeroscillators night & day instead! > >Best Wishes! > > >Cynthia > >http://www.cyndustries.com/ > > >Richard Brewster wrote: > > > >>I've discovered my ZO is a little bit off on the 1V/Oct tracking. It is >>more apparent at lower frequencies. It would be handy if the manual >>pointed out the location of the 1V/Oct trimpot. I haven't tried looking >>for it yet, but I will. >> >>-Richard Brewster >> >>http://www.pugix.com >> >> >>
Message
Re: [The_Cyndustries_List] ZO 1V/Octave calibration
2006-02-27 by Richard Brewster
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.